To clarify, "subarray" is defined like, for example: if A="abc" B="??a???b????c???" then A is subarray of B.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
why I can't find subarray correctly?
To clarify, "subarray" is defined like, for example: if A="abc" B="??a???b????c???" then A is subarray of B.
Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en5 | DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:30:36 | 2 | Tiny change: '&& B[curB]==c ) curB+' -> '&& B[curB]!=c ) curB+' (published) | ||
en4 | DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:25:51 | 14 | Tiny change: 'of B, but I get AC, II get WA:' -> 'of B, but versionI get AC, versionII get WA:' (saved to drafts) | ||
en3 | DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:24:47 | 537 | Tiny change: ' string.\n~~~~~\nc' - (published) | ||
en2 | DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:15:22 | 201 | |||
en1 | DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:14:05 | 149 | Initial revision (saved to drafts) |
Название |
---|