Can someone tell the approach for this interesting question: Question
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 151 |
8 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
Can someone tell the approach for this interesting question: Question
Name |
---|
Correct me if I'm wrong. My first thought for this problem was dp. dp(i) -> maximum posters till i th element in some defined order that works (maybe sort using x and y?) but soon became doubtful if such an order even exists. For all 2 pairs we can find if the 2 posters are overlapping or not. If we create a graph and add edge b/w 2 nodes (posters) if they are NOT overlapping, then we need to find the largest connected component size which is completely connected (edge b/w every pair #E=n(n-1)/2)
this is a matching problem , it kinda makes sense that no greedy/dp algorithm would work even if you didnt knew the tags tho.Most of the time if it is a problem about selecting things that are limiting each other by someway and no greedy seems to work, it is a matching problem.You can learn bipartite matching algorithm and then try the problem again
I keep false solving