Can someone tell the approach for this interesting question: Question
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
6 | Qingyu | 156 |
7 | djm03178 | 152 |
7 | adamant | 152 |
9 | luogu_official | 151 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Can someone tell the approach for this interesting question: Question
Name |
---|
Correct me if I'm wrong. My first thought for this problem was dp. dp(i) -> maximum posters till i th element in some defined order that works (maybe sort using x and y?) but soon became doubtful if such an order even exists. For all 2 pairs we can find if the 2 posters are overlapping or not. If we create a graph and add edge b/w 2 nodes (posters) if they are NOT overlapping, then we need to find the largest connected component size which is completely connected (edge b/w every pair #E=n(n-1)/2)
this is a matching problem , it kinda makes sense that no greedy/dp algorithm would work even if you didnt knew the tags tho.Most of the time if it is a problem about selecting things that are limiting each other by someway and no greedy seems to work, it is a matching problem.You can learn bipartite matching algorithm and then try the problem again
I keep false solving