Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3857 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3463 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 166 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 161 |
3 | Qingyu | 160 |
4 | Dominater069 | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | adamant | 155 |
7 | Um_nik | 151 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 148 |
Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
Name |
---|
looks like min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))) cannot exceed longest palindromic subsequence of Str, hence T=Str should work, i may be wrong tho
Actually it can exceed that.
Let $$$str = \text{aabb}$$$, $$$T = \text{abba}$$$. Now, $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba})) = \min(3, 3) = 3$$$.
If you choose $$$T = str$$$, you get $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{aabb}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{bbaa})) = \min(4, 2) = 2$$$.
yeah, i knew most probably my claim must be wrong
anyways, please tell how to solve the above problem