- I met this problem as a subproblem many times and tried to find a solution for it but failed ,So I make an elegent statement for the problem asking for someone's help :
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Name |
---|
Could you give a publicly available link instead of screenshots? Or at least tell where the problem is from? This looks fishy.
Edited , Bro
The reason why I asked for a link ia to prevent cheating, but considering the statement you sent doesn't even have a bound on the sum of $$$k_i$$$ i will assume youre not.
This is the maximum bipartite matching problem, you can read about it here https://cp-algorithms.com/graph/kuhn_maximum_bipartite_matching.html
However, this is an advanced topic and you should probably worry about other things more. If you're encountering this problem a lot youre probably making the wrong reductions.
I understood the topic , but can't it be solved in time complexity less than O(n*m) time , if we don't need the number of matchings, just need whether or not the solution exists
Kuhn is faster than $$$O(nm)$$$ in practice with the heuristics they talk about there. There is also a $$$O(n\sqrt{n})$$$ that as far as i know is hard to distinguish from kuhn. Asking if there is a perfect matching doesn't help in this problem.
Also, if you are thinking on how to solve a specific problem, send that specific problem instead. A lot of times when beginners ask for help they make wrong reductions and leave out important information, that's probably what is happening here.