# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Name |
---|
If I remember corretly, the mentioned problem from Run Twice contest appeared at Petrozavodsk summer camp 2022. My solution is to check whether the input graph has a $$$4$$$-clique: a random graph should not have it.
Nice! This solution feels a bit borderline to me: the graph has 1% of all edges when m=5000, so roughly speaking the probability of having a 4-clique is C(1000,4)*0.01^6 ~= 1000^4/24/100^6 = 1/24, so it might or might not appear in the ~100 testcases, not all of which have m=5000.