This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 151 |
This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
Name |
---|
You’re making an array of size $$$2e5+1$$$ for every test case and there are like $$$10^4$$$ tests. Instead you should’ve made the array of size $$$n+1$$$, and then proceeded with whatever you’re doing (this will get rid of the TLE)
Thank you!
But if i send it in C++20 it works 256544470
Do you know what could be the difference?
That is really strange. I don’t know why this happens; I’d expect it to TLE as well
the problem could be solved easily by counting number of cards having 2 ouccrences to get max score optimally . and your tle problem is solved by the guy before me
because u use (2e5+1) * (10^4) and this it too large, u can use map<int, int> instead