Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3898 |
2 | tourist | 3840 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | ksun48 | 3691 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3525 |
7 | gamegame | 3477 |
8 | Benq | 3468 |
9 | Ormlis | 3381 |
10 | maroonrk | 3379 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 166 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Dominater069 | 161 |
4 | atcoder_official | 159 |
4 | Um_nik | 159 |
6 | djm03178 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 150 |
9 | awoo | 149 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
Name |
---|
Why some people can't use codeforces as before...
U can generate testcase using normal software.And many top rated coders do that I guess.It is clearly legal until unless u use AI to tamper your code.
So its not cheating?
I don't think generating test cases can be considered cheating. U dont even need AI to do that.There are softwares that generate random numbers of various range and those are available in google.
I do think it's cheating. Debugging and writing stress tests is part of solving a problem, and writing a generator that generates random numbers in a specific format is part of that. Unless the input is only a single number, google rng will not be of much use.
Try to do tasks completely without AI. That way, you'll actually learn something from them!
.
whats the difference? lol. Both cases we are just generating test cases.