I have a question that : cin/cout with ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0) and scanf/printf. Which is faster? Can anybody help me? Thank you a lot!
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
I have a question that : cin/cout with ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0) and scanf/printf. Which is faster? Can anybody help me? Thank you a lot!
Название |
---|
look at this
or at this
Why don't you try to read 5*10^6 or 10^7 integers and see the difference?
cin/cout uses operator <<. That is function. If you do cin >> a >> b >> c; you call 3 functions. scanf, printf should be faster still. cin/cout are comfortable and simple, but not flexible as scanf/printf. If you want to find a way to get rid of scanf/printf then it is bad idea. I always recommend to use scanf/printf. There is no thing that scanf/printf can't but cin/cout can.
There is no thing that scanf/printf can't but cin/cout can.
To read string for example?
std::string seems like is using vector like container. This trick does it. But I am not talking about that. I am talking about reading 14 and 32 from "14:32" by ignoring ':', reading string(including spaces and newlines) until ';' or '$'. I do not think that cin can to that easily.