I've solved this problem using sqrt decomposition. but how can i solve it using segment tree?
Thanks in advance :)
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
I've solved this problem using sqrt decomposition. but how can i solve it using segment tree?
Thanks in advance :)
Name |
---|
You can solve this problem without sqrt decomposition and segment tree. See this 11088217 submission
[DELETED]
That solution uses the idea that since we're asking for all numbers x that have at least x occurences, and the maximum number of elements is 105, the maximum amount of such numbers is 446, because .
While it's not Mo's algorithm or dividing the queries into buckets, it's still based on the concept of square root.