Блог пользователя alohamaloha

Автор alohamaloha, 13 лет назад, По-английски

I have been trying this problem http://www.spoj.pl/problems/FPOLICE/. My idea is to modify the single source shortest path problem to 2-D.So instead of using an array to denote the shortest distance I am using a 2-D matrix where state[i][j] indicates the shortest path from the source to the ith node with still having j time left.(The upper limit on left time is denoted by t) Finally I check the last row (state[n-1][j] for all j=t to j=0 ) the minimum cost.If the minimum cost comes out to be INFINITY then there is no way to reach the destination with atleast 0 time remaining.If minimum costs occur for several values of j i pick up the j which is larger.That is the case which yields more remaining time ( i.e. minimum time).For the single source shortest path I started with dijikistra but then switched to bellman-ford for simplicity.(Doesn't looks like o(n^2*t) will be problem)

UPD: Code modified to fix some bugs

#include<stdio.h>
#include<iostream>
#include<algorithm>
#include<cmath>
#include<vector>
#include<cstdlib>
#include<stack>
#include<queue>
#include<string>
#include<cstring>


#define PR(x) printf(#x"=%d\n",x)
#define READ2(x,y) scanf("%d %d",&x,&y)
#define REP(i,a) for(int i=0;i<a;i++)
#define READ(x) scanf("%d",&x)
#define PRARR(x,n) for(int i=0;i<n;i++)printf(#x"[%d]=\t%d\n",i,x[i])
const int INF=2<<29;

int costMatr[101][101];
int timeMatr[101][101];
using namespace std;

int main()
	{
	int n;
	int t;
	/*Input section */
	int tstcase;
	scanf("%d",&tstcase);
	while(tstcase--){
	scanf("%d %d",&n,&t);
	for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
		for(int j=0;j<n;j++)
			{
			scanf("%d",&timeMatr[i][j]);
			}
	for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
		for(int j=0;j<n;j++)
			{
			scanf("%d",&costMatr[i][j]);
			}
	
	
	/*End input */	
	
	int state[101][251]; //state[i][j] represents cost from source node to ith node with j time remaining
	for(int i=1;i<n;i++) 
		for(int j=0;j<=t;j++)
		{
		
		 state[i][j]=INF; //initialize all states to infinity
		
		 }
		 
	for(int i=0;i<=t;i++) state[0][i]=0; //cost to reach 0th node will be 0 regardless of time left
	for(int i=1;i<n;i++)
	if(t-timeMatr[0][i]>=0) state[i][t-timeMatr[0][i]]=costMatr[0][i]; //initialize state matrix for neighbours of source nodeh

	/*DP begin */
	for(int k=t;k>=0;k--)
	
		{
		for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
		for(int j=0;j<n;j++)
		{
		if(i==j) continue;
		 
			if(costMatr[i][j]+state[i][k]<=state[j][k])
				{
				
				if(k-timeMatr[i][j]>=0) {
				#ifndef ONLINE_JUDGE
				printf("Distance to %dth node updated for time %d. previous value at this state=%d",j,k,state[j][k]);
				#endif
				state[j][k-timeMatr[i][j]]=costMatr[i][j]+state[i][k];
				#ifndef ONLINE_JUDGE
				printf("New value for this time %d =%d\n",k-timeMatr[i][j],state[j][k]);
				#endif
				}
				}
		
			
		}
	}
	
	/*DP END*/
	/*possible answer in state[n-1][t] where t is all possible values of remaining time */
	
	int minCost=INF;
	int minTime=t;	
	for(int k=t;k>=0;k--)
	{
	if(state[n-1][k]<minCost)
	{
	minCost=state[n-1][k];
	minTime=k;
	}
	}
	if(minCost==INF)
	puts("-1");
	else
	printf("%d %d\n",minCost,t-minTime);
	}
	}

Kindly suggest some test cases where my algorithm might be failing.I am almost sure my idea of 2-D Dp is correct,just that I am not able to implement it properly.

UPD: Got the bug.TYpo in if(costMatr[i][j]+state[i][k]<=state[j][k]) should have been if(costMatr[i][j]+state[i][k]<=state[j][k-timeMatr[i][j]])

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +2
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
13 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

Here is a simple case where the result is 3 3, but your code produces result 9 1:

1
4 5
0 1 1 1
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1
0 9 1 9
9 0 9 1
9 1 0 9
9 9 9 9
  • »
    »
    13 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I had noticed that and fixed that too..Since no one was responding forgot to update the code.Now my code gives correct o/p for your test case.

  • »
    »
    11 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Can you please explain how the answer of your test case is 3 3 and not 9 1 ?

    • »
      »
      »
      11 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

      We want to pick the path with minimum total risk, and if there are several such paths, pick the one with minimum time.

      In the test case moving along edges 1->3, 2->4 and 3->2 has risk 1, and all other edges have risk 9, so the optimal path is 1 -> 3 -> 2 -> 4, which has total risk 3 and time 3.

»
11 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

If you're still facing problems, I'd suggest you have two DPs. The first one computes the minimum risk such that time taken <= maximum Time. Now in the second DP, find out the minimum time such that sum of risks == minimum risk computed from first DP. I did it using this approach.