Wow!
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | maomao90 | 163 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | nor | 153 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Wow!
Name |
---|
Again ;_;
Well, different people's vote contribute differently to the contribution of upvoted/downvoted person. It depends on rating (yes, CF rating) of voting person. So if you have clean account with single comment and I upvote it, but tourist downvotes it, you get negative contribution.
I also noticed that, also if you have 80+ contribution your up/downvote affect reds too if their contribution is lower than yours. Thats interesting!
It depends on rating, not contribution.
I'm not so sure about the point raised by BekzhanKassenov but I do know that downvotes on comments aren't displayed until they hit -5, to prevent herd voting / bandwagon effect. They will, however, still affect your reputation.
It's very possible that your first comment got -4 and your second comment got +1, so the net result is still negative.
It's time for some proofs :) Here's the old blog by MikeMirzayanov, but I'm not really sure if it is actual now (could not find any info about cancelling that rule).