I'm trying to come up with a recursive solution for this problem but I haven't been able to so far. Any advice/pointers here?
I tried 0-1 knapsack style but there is an issue with backtracking the array.
→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 4039 |
| 2 | tourist | 3841 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
| 5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
| 6 | Benq | 3535 |
| 7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 8 | gamegame | 3477 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3357 |
| 10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 168 |
| 2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 160 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
| 7 | adamant | 153 |
| 8 | luogu_official | 152 |
| 9 | awoo | 151 |
| 10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2025 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Jan/22/2025 20:08:51 (h1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
It appears that the statement is actually asking for the number of permutations of 1... n with k inversions. If In(t) is the number of permutations of size n with t inversions, then
. This recurrence can be calculated in O(nt) using prefix sums on In.