Same code got TLE in GNU C++11 and got AC in GNU C++17. Can someone please tell me the reason behind it?
TLE (C++11): http://codeforces.net/contest/1520/submission/115347126
AC (C++17): http://codeforces.net/contest/1520/submission/115347176
Thanks!
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Same code got TLE in GNU C++11 and got AC in GNU C++17. Can someone please tell me the reason behind it?
TLE (C++11): http://codeforces.net/contest/1520/submission/115347126
AC (C++17): http://codeforces.net/contest/1520/submission/115347176
Thanks!
Name |
---|
Running the same code in custom invocation and printing
v.size()
gives81
in C++17 and9090927
in C++11, so you're iterating over significantly more values when submitting under C++11 per test case. As for why, there appears to be a difference in the implementation ofpow
, ask
takes on the values1, 11, 111
in C++17 and1, 11, 110
in C++11. Not sure why that happens though, I think the actual implementation ofpow
is architecture dependent. In my opinion, it's easier to just not involve floating point computation if possible.