C++ environment for larger projects

№	Пользователь	Рейтинг
1	tourist	4009
2	jiangly	3823
3	Benq	3738
4	Radewoosh	3633
5	jqdai0815	3620
6	orzdevinwang	3529
7	ecnerwala	3446
8	Um_nik	3396
9	ksun48	3390
10	gamegame	3386

№	Пользователь	Вклад
1	cry	167
2	Um_nik	163
3	maomao90	162
3	atcoder_official	162
5	adamant	159
6	-is-this-fft-	158
7	awoo	157
8	TheScrasse	154
9	Dominater069	153
9	nor	153

I am curious to know kinds of setups you guys use when working on projects outside of CP and what kind of features you look for.

The IDE I have been most satisfied with thus far is CLion. CLion is not a free IDE but students are qualified for free licenses. I am quite happy with it thus far except that it is a bit slow. Also, I would like to use a tool that is free to use even when I am no longer a student.

From what I know, Visual Studio is the industry standard, but I have always been drawn away from it because I am most comfortable with GCC and know next to nothing about MSVC. Also, as I understand a lot of nice features of Visual Studio come with the Visual Assist extension which is not free. It is also not available on Linux (I dual boot, so I could kind of live with this but it is not ideal).

I have also used VSCode for a while, but I found VSCode's autocomplete to be quite bad even with the C++ extension installed, and it was also really slow (especially the autocomplete).

Recently I started experimenting with QtCreator but I haven't had enough experience with it to say much. It feels snappier than CLion but the UI is a bit different most IDEs I have worked with and I get a bit lost looking for certain features.

Finally, I suppose Vim is always an option but I expect setting up refactoring features like moving function definitions from headers to source files and things like that would be painful to set up.

So yeah, in summary, I would love to hear what your preferences are, whether you would be willing to pay for an IDE, etc. or perhaps any advice on using the programs I mentioned (maybe they are good tools and I am just bad at using them?).

. ├── CMakeLists.txt ├── include │ └── library_name │ └── library_name.hpp └── modules ├── module1 │ ├── CMakeLists.txt │ ├── include │ │ └── library_name │ │ ├── module1 │ │ │ ├── header1.hpp │ │ │ ├── *......hpp │ │ │ └── headern.hpp │ │ └── module1.hpp │ └── src │ ├── header1.cpp │ ├── *......cpp │ └── headern.cpp └── module2 ├── CMakeLists.txt ├── ... same hierarchy as above

├── include │ └── project │ └── headers.hpp ├── src │ ├── headers.cpp │ └── main.cpp └── unit_test ├── headers_tests.cpp └── *.......cpp

Комментарии (5)

Написать комментарий?

JaroPaska

3 года назад, # |

Auto comment: topic has been updated by JaroPaska (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Ответить

jalsol

I use Neovim for everything. I use Neovim for CP, for actual projects, for writing, for nagivating files, etc.

tronifier

For compiler, I use vim(it's fast for my slow system and I can do any edit without using my shitty touchpad even once). The first thing I do is create a hierarchy of the project. If it's some library, then I would go with:-

If I am working on a project, then it would be this:-

Finally, for controlling the software compilation process, I use CMake. At first, I was reluctant to use it, since my old habit of using make would just throw in, but slowly I got used to it. There are many advantages of it over make, like, it's cross-platform, can do external library detection and configuration.

998244853

I use CMake or PreMake with VS Code.

If windows specific project, then Visual Studio (with premake)

Блог пользователя JaroPaska