| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Different time and memory complexity in different compiler
Hi!
I've found this strange thing(maybe not that strange who already knows it). Can anyone explain why this takes less time and memory complexity in C++14 and C++17 compilers than in the C++20 compiler? I've attached the time and memory complexity of this problem below.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en4 |
|
cloud_007 | 2022-09-22 08:21:34 | 223 | ||
| en3 |
|
cloud_007 | 2022-09-22 08:19:50 | 28 | Tiny change: ') below.\n below.\n[image](https://' | |
| en2 |
|
cloud_007 | 2022-09-22 08:18:45 | 30 | Tiny change: '/F) below.' -> '/F) below.\n' | |
| en1 |
|
cloud_007 | 2022-09-22 08:17:58 | 379 | Initial revision (published) |
