I recently received a notice regarding the similarity of my solution (287782748) for problem 2033E. I want to clarify that my solution was developed independently. I utilized the idea that when there a cycle size of greater than two present it means there is a problem because first possibility element is in its position and second one is two elements position are alternate. If any other combination occur we need swap so two elements swap means we need half of that cycle that's was the idea used by me to solve that problem and worked through the problem step-by-step. Below I attached a image of gfg where visited array concept used I used this as a reference for that question . I really not copied from other . I even don't know who the person is . I understand that there can be similarities in competitive programming due to the nature of common algorithms and problem-solving techniques. I assure you that my intention was not to violate any rules. If needed, I can provide additional context or documentation regarding my thought process during the development of my solution. AND also the solution is not exactly same it used the cycle_size>1 and i used > 2 .

Thank you for your understanding, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this matter.

Best regards, Simran_200.