I wonder why so many high-rated users do not use short FOR-loop in c++. I think that there are many benefits of using it like better readability of your code and it also saves time. So, why users like tourist do not use it?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3839 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
4 | Benq | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
9 | Um_nik | 3396 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | Um_nik | 164 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | maomao90 | 161 |
4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
4 | cry | 158 |
4 | awoo | 158 |
7 | nor | 155 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
10 | maroonrk | 152 |
Using short FOR-cycle
I wonder why so many high-rated users do not use short FOR-loop in c++. I think that there are many benefits of using it like better readability of your code and it also saves time. So, why users like tourist do not use it?
Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en3 | HappyLittlePony | 2016-02-21 14:51:16 | 17 | |||
en2 | HappyLittlePony | 2016-02-21 12:36:20 | 13 | |||
en1 | HappyLittlePony | 2016-02-21 12:34:22 | 244 | Initial revision (published) |
Название |
---|