Is it true that if a biconnected component has an odd simple cycle, then ALL edges in that component belong to some (not necessarily the same) odd simple cycle? If that's the case, what would be a formal proof for that? I believe this property would be crucial to solve this problem: http://codeforces.net/problemset/problem/97/E
→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3839 |
| 3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 4 | Benq | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 7 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Um_nik | 164 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 3 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
| 4 | cry | 158 |
| 4 | awoo | 158 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | nor | 154 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 152 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Proof that if a biconnected component has an odd simple cycle, then ALL edges in such component belong to some odd simple cycle?
Difference between en1 and en2,
changed 28 character(s)
History
Revisions
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
pabloskimg | 2018-04-28 09:29:16 | 28 | ||
| en1 |
|
pabloskimg | 2018-04-28 08:08:52 | 429 | Initial revision (published) |
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2024 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Oct/01/2024 19:45:24 (i1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
