Request for opinions/reviews of my blog post on segment trees
Difference between en3 and en4, changed 25 character(s)
I wrote a blog post on generalizing segment trees:↵
[https://sharmaeklavya2.github.io/blog/generalizing-segment-trees.html](https://sharmaeklavya2.github.io/blog/generalizing-segment-trees.html)↵

It's about a method of generalizing segment trees by expressing query outputs as 
elements of a monoids and update functions as composable endomorphisms. The blog post explains what these terms mean, why they are suitable abstractions and demonstrates concepts with examples.↵

Can I please get comments/reviews/opinions on it? Do you think it is (or can be slightly altered to make it) useful 
for othersinteresting?↵

You can see the templated C++ code here: [https://gist.github.com/sharmaeklavya2/99ed35efbb639bbe7d7b46b89b74fea0](https://gist.github.com/sharmaeklavya2/99ed35efbb639bbe7d7b46b89b74fea0)↵

The blog post turned out to be more detailed and theoretical than I was expecting.↵
It's more concerned with mathematical and algorithmic aspects than the practicality of using it in contests.↵
But I can change that if you think that would make it better.

History

 
 
 
 
Revisions
 
 
  Rev. Lang. By When Δ Comment
en5 English eku 2019-07-30 18:17:40 154
en4 English eku 2019-07-30 00:52:24 25 minor changes: 'monoids' -> 'elements of a monoid', 'useful for others' -> 'useful or interesting'
en3 English eku 2019-07-30 00:38:34 230 (published)
en2 English eku 2019-07-30 00:26:24 253
en1 English eku 2019-07-30 00:22:01 817 Initial revision (saved to drafts)