I had some issues with understanding Ques A from Edu Round 112, but I found a different way of approaching the problem.

Consider x,y,z to be the Pizzas ordered of slices 6, 8 and 10 respectively. Thus we require: 6x+8y+10z >= n => 2*(3x+4y+5z)>=n

We see that any integer k>=3 can be represented by the expression 3x+4y+5z with non negative values of x,y,z (atleast one such triplet x,y,z will always exist) . (This observation is key to the approach. The proof of this observation is given at the end of this article.) Thus, any even integer>=6 can be represented by 2*(3x+4y+5z) = 6x+8y+10z . #OBSV1

Now, we know that in order to minimize the time, we would want the number of final slices that we order to be as close to n as possible. In other words, we would want the extra slices we order (that take extra time to make) to be as close to 0 as possible.

If n is even (and >=6) then we can write it in terms of 2*(3x+4y+5z) exactly (#OBSV1); the number of extra slices we order will be 0. If n is odd (and >6), then we cannot write n as 2*(3x+4y+5z) exactly because this expression will always give an even number. However, we can write n+1 as 2*(3x+4y+5z) exactly, making the number of extra slices we have to order just 1.

The total time taken would be 15x + 20y + 25z = 5*(3x+4y+5z). Thus, if we know the optimal answer for 3x+4y+5z ,we can easily calculate the total time by multiplying this by 5.

Hence, we have an algorithm:

-> If n<6 then we would have to order atleast the 6 slices pizza. Thus the minimum time possible for this case would be 15 mins directly.

-> Else If n is even then divide n by 2 and find the optimal value of 3x+4y+5z, or else if n is odd then divide (n+1) by 2 and find the optimal value of 3x+4y+5z.

-> Multiply the optimal value of 3x+4y+5z by 5 to get the minimum time to get atleast n slices.

Proof that any integer k >= 3 can be written in the form of 3x+4y+5z where x>=0, y>=0 and z>=0 :

This proof is trivial for the cases of k=3, k=4, k=5.

Thus consider k>=6.

By the division theorem: k = 3*(k//3) + k%3 => k = 3*(k//3 — 1) + 3 + k%3

Now 3 + k%3 can be either 3 or 4 or 5. In either case, we have represented k as a linear combination of 3 , 4 and 5.

Hence proved.