I have built a brute force solution to this problem but of course time limit exceeded monster has appeared!
please can anyone explain a solution or just give a hint for this problem, i have read the editorial but i didn't understand what is written.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | Qingyu | 156 |
7 | adamant | 151 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
7 | luogu_official | 151 |
10 | awoo | 146 |
I have built a brute force solution to this problem but of course time limit exceeded monster has appeared!
please can anyone explain a solution or just give a hint for this problem, i have read the editorial but i didn't understand what is written.
recently i have been studying graph theory from competitive programming book ,in applications of DFS there was articulation points and bridges . He defines other than visited array a another one here is the statement.
[This algorithm maintains two numbers: dfs_num(u) and dfs_low(u). Here, dfs_num(u) stores the iteration counter when the vertex u is visited for the first time and not just for distinguishing DFS_WHITE versus DFS_GRAY/DFS_BLACK. The other number dfs_low(u) stores the lowest dfs_num reachable from DFS spanning sub tree of u. Initially dfs_low(u) = dfs_num(u) when vertex u is first visited. Then, dfs_low(u) can only be made smaller if there is a cycle (some back edges exist). Note that we do not update dfs_low(u) with back edge (u, v) if v is a direct parent of u. ]
please anyone give an explanation for this part.
Name |
---|