# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 170 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
7 | Dominater069 | 154 |
9 | awoo | 153 |
10 | luogu_official | 152 |
Name |
---|
Haven't examined the whole code, but one issue that jumps out is that you use
lower_bound
for the set wrongly. The way you use it, it works slower than $$$O(\log n)$$$ (either $$$O(n)$$$ or $$$O(n \log n)$$$, don't remember exactly). When you uselower_bound
orupper_bound
for a set-like structure, you should call it as a member function.