wuhudsm's blog

Invitation to TheForces Round #16 (2^4-Forces)
By wuhudsm, history, 17 months ago, In English

Hello, Codeforces!

We are happy to invite you to TheForces Round #16 (2^4-Forces), which will take place on Jun/11/2023 18:05 (Moscow time)

What is TheForces Round?

You will have 150 minutes to solve 6 problems.

The registration is open now, Don't forget the time!

The difficulty of some problems may be close, so we strongly recommend you to read all statements.

Good luck!

Editorial is out

Discord Server (1000+ people)

Contests' archive

  • Vote: I like it
  • +97
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +57 Vote: I do not like it

I think you mistakenly released the editorial. Anyway, I will be honest and open the editorial only when the contest ends.

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Link of Contests' archive in the blog is wrong. This is link of Contests' archive.

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +26 Vote: I do not like it

Fixed,thx

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +15 Vote: I do not like it

As a tester, I can ensure that the problems are awesome and you will enjoy solving them!

Tip
→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

As a tester, I forgot to write As a tester comment earlier

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +18 Vote: I do not like it

Why don't you set a regular CF round?

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

As a tester, i have changed this comment (iykyk)

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Why ad-hoc-Forces changed to 2^4-Forces?

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +63 Vote: I do not like it

$$$2^{2^2}$$$-Forces

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Just curious, why this round doesn't like previous rounds that shows up in the gym contests list? That would be much easier to find.

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Amir_Parsa (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

will the problems be sorted by difficulty?

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Reminder, contest start in 30 minutes!

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +42 Vote: I do not like it

The 4th sample of problem F: $$$9\underline{69096}909 - 996\underline{069909} - 9966\underline{0669}0 - 99\underline{666}9900 - 999999900$$$

Is this sequence correct? If so, the author solution is wrong

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    17 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +27 Vote: I do not like it

    I guess your idea is correct. I am trying to contact wuhudsm, but unfortunately, it is now 2 am (or 3 am? i'm not sure) in his time zone, so it may have to wait at least 6 hours to resolve this issue.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    17 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it -7 Vote: I do not like it

    AHAHAHA, as always.

    → Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +47 Vote: I do not like it

for problem c, what's the point of having y="0", when you said y won't have leading zeros? 0 has leading zeros!

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

Truly, A WA pretest 2 round :( like the spoiler describes.

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +17 Vote: I do not like it

Good problems. Don’t have any idea of F though.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    17 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    Can you give any hint for E?

    → Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

Editorial when?

→ Reply
»
17 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Amir_Parsa (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply