wxt1221's blog

DO NOT WAIT IN QUEUE
By wxt1221, history, 3 months ago, In English

Hello Mike, and go to fix up your judger.

It prevent me from virtual practising.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +86
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
3 months ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +45 Vote: I do not like it

We should donate money to CF in order for them to add more judgers :) and have more funding to combat against cheaters.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

    I have 2 servers that are idle most of the time. They could help maybe.

    → Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +19 Vote: I do not like it

inqueueforces

→ Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

Your vote has been sent. It will be processed in a minute.

→ Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +32 Vote: I do not like it

if we want people to get judged instantly, Mike should just implement a submission stack

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I don't think so. Queue is better.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      3 months ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

      imo priority queue better :)

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        3 months ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        How to define < (operator) ? :)

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          3 months ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it +59 Vote: I do not like it
          just joking
          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            3 months ago, # ^ |
            ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            No, I completely agree with you sir. As a ratist I support :D

            edit: I feel like i need to clarify that i'm joking.

            → Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -9 Vote: I do not like it

Judger should just do a probabilistic verdict based on rating.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +44 Vote: I do not like it

    I have negative probablity to solve problems.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    A probabilistic skipped submission if a person has cheated before

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    all the newbie retards downvoting :'(

    → Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by wxt1221 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

We can donate Codeforces, which is not only possible for RMJ, but also greatly increased the evaluation speed.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    My English is not good, and what I say "become possible for RMJ" refers to making Mike think about the new method about Cloudflare faster.

    → Reply
»
3 months ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

I'm back in the queue. I find it strange that several (probably most) solutions that were submitted after mine have already been processed. What criteria are used to let some forward and some backward?

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    3 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

    It seems that a large amount of solutions judged are solutions of problems from CF2004 (yesterday's edu round)

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      3 months ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

      Oh, that's right. I hadn't even noticed that. But according to the time stamp, these are solutions that were submitted in the last few minutes and not yesterday. I don't seem to understand something.

      Whatever. I think it's perfectly okay that the solutions from current contests have priority.

      → Reply