Hello Mike, and go to fix up your judger.
It prevent me from virtual practising.
→ Обратите внимание
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3773 |
| 3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3624 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 5 | Benq | 3620 |
| 7 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 2 | cry | 161 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 4 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
| 5 | awoo | 158 |
| 6 | atcoder_official | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 7 | nor | 155 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 148 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2024 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 20.09.2024 05:54:29 (k1).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
We should donate money to CF in order for them to add more judgers :) and have more funding to combat against cheaters.
I have 2 servers that are idle most of the time. They could help maybe.
inqueueforces
Your vote has been sent. It will be processed in a minute.
*3-5 business days
Based.
if we want people to get judged instantly, Mike should just implement a submission stack
I don't think so. Queue is better.
imo priority queue better :)
How to define < (operator) ? :)
No, I completely agree with you sir. As a ratist I support :D
edit: I feel like i need to clarify that i'm joking.
Judger should just do a probabilistic verdict based on rating.
I have negative probablity to solve problems.
A probabilistic skipped submission if a person has cheated before
all the newbie retards downvoting :'(
Auto comment: topic has been updated by wxt1221 (previous revision, new revision, compare).
We can donate Codeforces, which is not only possible for RMJ, but also greatly increased the evaluation speed.
My English is not good, and what I say "become possible for RMJ" refers to making Mike think about the new method about Cloudflare faster.
I'm back in the queue. I find it strange that several (probably most) solutions that were submitted after mine have already been processed. What criteria are used to let some forward and some backward?
It seems that a large amount of solutions judged are solutions of problems from CF2004 (yesterday's edu round)
Oh, that's right. I hadn't even noticed that. But according to the time stamp, these are solutions that were submitted in the last few minutes and not yesterday. I don't seem to understand something.
Whatever. I think it's perfectly okay that the solutions from current contests have priority.