Please read the new rule regarding the restriction on the use of AI tools. ×

Kurta_Sofia's blog

By Kurta_Sofia, history, 14 hours ago, translation, In English

Good afternoon, Sofia Kurta is not my name, but in the photo, it is indeed me in my younger years. I was a participant in many olympiads during my childhood, and later I was a volunteer at some olympiads, for example, EGOI.

So, let's get to the essence of the differences between men and women in the field of programming from my experience. Fortunately, in my country, there are already positive trends regarding this: you can regularly see wise and smart girls at IOI, and the top prize spots are often filled by women. This is obviously progress compared to the sexist past years. But if you take a closer look, the peak for the ratio of the female part of the team to the male is about half, while for men, it is normal to fill the whole team. This is terrible.

Here's where I see the root of the problem — what is the situation with this share of girls at previous stages? You can barely find them there. The problem here is already in the system itself and in the approach of teachers who push boys to olympiads, who somehow manage the school math program, because how could they send a girl there — this was exactly my case during school years. That season, the boy took the second-to-last place at the district level, and there was also a "wonderful" subjective evaluation of the code by the school teacher, because of which I didn’t make it further. I can't help but express my complaints to parents with outdated views who, until you show them a diploma as proof that you are capable of something, will keep convincing you that this is not for you and you should leave it to the boys — awful.

Of course, it's not just about the results. I was very "lucky" to be the only girl or one of the few girls at many olympiads, which gave me the opportunity to feel all the attention from the big programmers and teachers with coaches. "What is such a beautiful girl doing here?" — a favorite question. But I will be solving the problems! Surely, after that, I won’t be talking with you. Why don't they ask such questions to any of the boys, when at any olympiad there are obvious passengers? And these handouts, when they give you a prize at the programming camp just because you are of a different build, is also one of my favorite situations, as if I need your praise for something.

So smoothly, or maybe not, we approach another painful topic. Will many of you consider a woman equal, even if she has the same results, the same rating on Codeforces? Of course, the majority of you are an adequate society. But I’ve come across individuals who wouldn’t talk to me because I am a woman and should be weaker, while talking calmly with others, even weaker ones — strange.

I would like to highlight the arrogance from some men towards women's olympiads. As if it's an olympiad for the disabled, and any of them would take the first absolute prizes there. There was a case during my volunteering at EGOI when a girl won a medal, was happy, and then after talking with her "friends," she began to say that it was nothing yet, and she would have to prove something at other olympiads. What good did they do with this? Did they take away her moment of happiness and pride? Yes. Don’t you dare belittle the significance of women's olympiads, it looks very disgusting.

Conclusion: the school system and parents' views are still outdated, with which it is impossible to build equal conditions. Despite this, there are prospects in the next generation, where the share of blind sexists is quite small.

Thank you for your attention, respect the !weaker, equal gender.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +30
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
70 minutes ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

Are you on the mandatory list to defend your country in the case of war? Can you emigrate in such case?

»
58 minutes ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

The whole point of having a special olympiad for a specific sex sounds a bit odd to me, for physical sports, I can understand, that there is a need to have separate competitions for men and women.

Maybe olympiads type of competitions do not need to have sex-specific competitions. This itself makes the other gender look weak.

Having competitions to encourage young women can be considered a special case, or else I don't see a reason to have different competitions.

  • »
    »
    28 minutes ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Suppose there weren't gender-specific olympiads. Let's take a look at some supposedly gender-neutral olympiad.

    Say, for whatever reason, 90% of participants are men, 10% are women. Statistically, women are going to get worse top results (the averages might be the same, but who cares about averages in sports?), so the society believes women are not worth investing in, so they aren't trained, so the cycle continues.

    Woman-only competitions exist precisely to encourage women to train -- and, on the flip side, for the trainers to take women seriously.

»
49 minutes ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Sad to see that you feel this way. Unfortunately, the argument of why there are less females than males in olympiad is way more nuanced than just "sexism". I won't comment on what those are, there are enough resources available on the internet if you are willing to read them. But most of those overlap with why there is a women's section in say chess, for example. On a lighter note, No, women aren't weaker. The vast majority of them just are smart enough to do better and more meaningful things with their life than stare at a computer screen for hours trying to solve abstract mathematical problems.

  • »
    »
    43 minutes ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    The vast majority of them just are smart enough to do better and more meaningful things with their life than stare at a computer screen for hours trying to solve abstract mathematical problems.

    Says Mr.Newbie who could not enjoy solving math problems and finding every loophole to complain about it

    I completely agree with other parts of your arguments though

  • »
    »
    22 minutes ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    You can't just say "I won't comment on what those are" without any links and assume you won the argument.

    The reason for this effect, and the same effect in Chess, is precisely sexism. No one takes women seriously, so no one invests in women, so women don't achieve good enough results (and when they do, they're accused of not being women, cue Olympics).

    What sends me spiraling is that this fear and feelings of supremacy are internalized by women. It's xenophobia all around, there just isn't another explanation for, say, FIDE banning trans women from participating in female chess. It's people in control exercising said control in unfair ways all around.

  • »
    »
    19 minutes ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

    'Unfortunately, the argument of why there are less females than males in olympiad is way more nuanced than just "sexism"'

    Maybe it's just that, the amount of males participating in the qualifications round is more, and hence more male talents qualify for the selections. Maybe the females participating in the qualifications round are just not that good to take on the competition with those particular talented males who qualified.

    Why do you see that only males qualify? See that many males are not qualifying also and neither are the females.

    Why are females not participating? I don't know. Maybe because of taboo, maybe they are not interested,

    And for the case, the op is saying, I think it's just an issue at her place, maybe. So she will have to deal with it herself, just like we all deal with our own challenges. Like I am not good enough in CP, so I am dealing with it by practicing daily.

»
47 minutes ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

You are right. The solution though is not expecting "the next generation" in the school system, but advocating for more open contests without any restrictions on age\gender\number of tries and so on. Ideally pushing your company to organize competitions, if your company can afford that.

Government\state affiliated or international competitions are generally extremely bad because of the tons of restrictions they have anyway, unlikely that they'll ever be fixed.

»
44 minutes ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

But if you take a closer look, the peak for the ratio of the female part of the team to the male is about half, while for men, it is normal to fill the whole team. This is terrible.

In China, we choose the people who ranked 1, 2, 3 and 4 in team selection contests. Does this change anything about that ratio?