Good evening!
Glad to see you at the 58-th beta round. Problems for today's contest are prepared by Orel STU and NNSU teams.
Good luck everyone!
Unfortunately, statement of problem A was incorrect in English. Russian statement was OK. I'm sorry for this mistake.
Results and ratings were updated.
Thanks for everybody who solve this contest!
Dont worry dude! , The problems were really nice.
I am waiting for nice editorials .
(although I messed up with prob. 1 too! ;) )
its so unfair :(
But I lost both of them and god crazy, and so ... :D
jiong。
there must be some to adjust that ...in ratings...like not rating the first one..and calculating the points for rest of the question , ofcourse reducing the time of contest as well while calculating.
Lets see what happens.
Can anyone suggest some website to learn Russian .
It would have helped me today .
And is it tough ?
1 50000
ababababababab...
Is that really correct from a problem statement?? My program got TLE on this hack because it was expecting an additional one non-empty line.
Is that really correct from a problem statement??
Mine generator has made
1 50000
abab...
baba... (150000 symbols)
Thank you for the reply :)
However, the future codeforces system should write tests in the form you have written in your comment.
Sorry for my hack) Be more attentive ;)
For example,
"That is, they are comfortable when between any two girl's fingers there is a boy's finger."
I believed that the boy can't put more than one fingers because of this statement...
Maybe it should be "at least one finger"?
Correct! , Because of that I made mistake!!
very bad and long statements problems (hard to be understood)
How can it be rated ???
The mistake in problem statement was very great and can't be solve with this decision.
First of all , Just removing points for hacking doesnt , account for all those things that could have happened and that has happened.
REMEMBER "Butterfly Effect" .
or "Chaos Theory" .
So, If you want to rate , plz take "OTHER" things into considerations ...and balance the ratings.
Otherwise don't rate.
The problems were nice, though.
The problems were really nice. It would be sad ending of a good contest if it is unrated.
Recently, the problems statement are so hard to understand!
These difficult statement and complex story has no significance at all.
Please express the questions with an easy way.
Thanks a lot!
For problem C, I can only understand the problem after reading the output specification. (And, I can understand the problem by *JUST* reading the output specification.)
you know that after locking any problem , you cant submit problem again
All results of hacks of problem A will be annuled. You do not take you +100/-50 points for each hack of this problem.
Good One!?!
If one chooses to have the round rated for them, on what basis will the new rating be calculated? I mean, will it take into account the performance of all contestants, or just the ones who have also agreed to be rated? In the latter case, the rating can be quite skewed/random, because there will be no poor performers in the group of people who agree to be rated. So I think the first case is the way to go.
How can we know if we should want to be rated? ;) Will our possible rating be calculated and presented to us?
Also, if so, why not just raise ratings for exactly those contestants who have the new rating higher than the old one?
I think it's up to the organizers to decide. If I were them, I would make the round unrated without any hesitation (and announce that 15 minutes into the contest, as soon as it became apparent that all hell is going to break loose with the hacking and what not).
However, if the organizers decide that the round will be half-rated, I don't expect many people to choose to have their rating lower, yet unbiased.
Hmm..., I rate this site as high as TopCoder , So I guess, making it totally unrated would be good descision.
Because, allowing people to choose to be rated, seems little odd
and little uneasy when the reputation of this site comes in mind.
Not rating this will not affect anything, we will say just a bad day...
if you ignore hacks on A
He's just that good.
Just kidding :D He probably read the Russian statement, which was fine.
you know that after locking any problem , you cant submit problem again
contest is ambigious specially problem A
Hey, How do you know about "ever" .. I just saw it was your first contest.
X-(
IMO, the Rating calculations should be done including all participants.
The Confirm button just for agreeing of applying this changes.
If all participants take this strategy, ratings are only increased in this round. This means that average of ratings is increased. It can be considered that ratings of who are not participated in this round are relatively decreased. I think that this is also unfair.
It's impossible because rating sum of all participants before contest and after contest must be equal
Gerald: Just one SQL request... ;-)
If this is not possible, the contest better be unrated for all.
It was nowhere told about that rule. :(
Even if we need to wait results till the start of registration to CFBR#59(Div.2).
It would be more fair.
I didnt participate, but I confirmed LoL.
Hey Alex_kpr change ur profile picture .
It is getting on my nerves. It looks like a psychopath. :P
There is no words such as "more tolerancy" ... :P
Can we get who have chosen be rated?
and how?
i don't like competing with a lot of reds :D
we can't change our decision ?
Thanks for nice problems! May I know when solutions will be out?
searchattentiveness. Solution.