Which approach is better for improving in competitive programming?
- > Solve problems rating-wise, get stuck, identify the topic, and then learn it.
- > Learn algorithms first, then solve problems topic-wise.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3857 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3463 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 166 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 161 |
3 | Qingyu | 160 |
4 | Dominater069 | 159 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | adamant | 153 |
7 | Um_nik | 152 |
8 | djm03178 | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 148 |
- > Solve problems rating-wise, get stuck, identify the topic, and then learn it.
- > Learn algorithms first, then solve problems topic-wise.
Name |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by NazmulGo (previous revision, new revision, compare).
I think first approach is better.Because when you participate in contest like div2 round then you have to solve first a,b and c to reach in expert level quickly.And for solving a,b and c you have a good power of implementing ideas too fastly. there is no need any heavy algorithm to solve a,b and c.
Solve problems in your rating or above by 100->200 and if some problem needs a topic that you don't know , then that's a sign that you should learn this topic..
Anyway reaching expert doesn't need many topics but DP and Binary search and some standard topics.
read this