Hello all,
I am trying to solve this problem .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15... and on so
Given three points A,B,C such that A <= B <= C. We have to report whether given points form an equilateral triangle or not .
I made this solution and but this is not considering all the cases. Here is my solution .
SOLUTION:
we know that a triangle ABC is equilateral if A==B && B==C. (equality is an equivalence relation).
So Let us consider A,B,C such that A < B < C . Now we can find the side BC as C-B+1.
Next step is to check whether the other two sides are equal to this or not .for that purpose .. we can calculate the level of each of A,B and C then take the difference.. for any nodes its level will be x A<=(x*(x+1))/2 for the smallest possible x.
comparing all the three to check the existence of an equilateral triangle .
Here is the python implementation link of the above idea http://ideone.com/V5fuhe
but this will fail on the test case 5 , 13 , 15 answer should be false but my code will report is true .
Can anyone suggest me some idea to solve this problem ..
Also you need to check that the distances from start of the corresponding lines to numbers A and B are equal. If number A lies on level x, the distance is equal to A - x * (x - 1) / 2
Thank you so much You mean i need to compare the distance from start of line to the first number and to the second number. These both result should be equal.
My personal doubleposting problems :\
I would solve like this:
Let's find levels of our numbers: LA, LB, LC.
Cases:
1) LA ≠ LB ≠ LC
2) LA = LB = LC
3) LA = LB
4) LB = LC
In first two cases answer is false.
Last two cases are equal so let's consider that we have case №3.
If B - A ≠ LC - LA then answer is false.
Otherwise let's count first elements in rows LA and LC: FA, FC.
And now if C - FC = B - FA then answer is true, otherwise false.
So for case №2 answer will be C — B == LC - LA && A — FA == B — FC.
So the total answer is C — B == LC - LA && B — A == FC - FA || B — A == LC - LA && C — B == FC - FA.
Strange formulas came from looking at this triangle thing.
@Wackloner
Thanx for the nice explanation of the problem .