Is 10^9 computation is possible before 2.00 seconds? If not possible,how my solution works of following problem? Problem link: http://codeforces.net/problemset/problem/851/C Submission: http://codeforces.net/contest/851/submission/30089349
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Is 10^9 computation is possible before 2.00 seconds? If not possible,how my solution works of following problem? Problem link: http://codeforces.net/problemset/problem/851/C Submission: http://codeforces.net/contest/851/submission/30089349
Name |
---|
It depends on what you mean by "computation". I assume here you mean that your solution is O(n3) and n ≤ 103 hence the number 109, but for each triplet of points you process here, you are making many more auxiliary "computations", each of which take different amounts of time. If I understand you correctly, generally brute forcing 109 cases will not pass in 2 seconds, but I think your continue; and return; statements in your function pruned the search considerably (it can be shown that, by at latest the 12th iteration, there will be an acute angle).