# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
9 | awoo | 152 |
10 | luogu_official | 151 |
Name |
---|
If your query will not be affected with overlapped ranges like RMQ (i.e RMQ in range [1, 10] is the same of min( RMQ[1, 6], RMQ[4, 10]) ), then you can solve it in
O(1)
. But if your query will be affected with overlapped ranges like Range Sum Query, then you have to solve it inO(log(n))
as mentioned in hackerearth like.OK, I got it. Thanks for reply.