№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3977 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3483 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3381 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3358 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 170 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
8 | awoo | 152 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Название |
---|
Nobody??? Not even an opinion.....
It's proved, years don't pass along your mind :) After 3 years, you take a look at the problem again, think of it about 15 minutes, and you get a new optimization that solves it :) In this case that the longest meaningful code must be less than the length of the message :) solution
First of all, thank you kindly for source code with solution! However, I am a bit confused with 1 particular moment: why in the solution it is ok to pick n starting from m/2? How is that possible that it provides correct result if half of possible keys are ignored? Thanks in advance!
If a key of length k is valid, then that key squared (of length 2 * k) is valid too, so we only need to check key lengths that can't be squared, aka starting from m / 2.