Unable to solve the problem Editorial is also not available . Can anybody explain? Thanks in advance:)
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3898 |
2 | tourist | 3840 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | ksun48 | 3691 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3525 |
7 | gamegame | 3477 |
8 | Benq | 3468 |
9 | Ormlis | 3381 |
10 | maroonrk | 3379 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | Dominater069 | 161 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 160 |
6 | djm03178 | 157 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 151 |
9 | awoo | 149 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
Unable to solve the problem Editorial is also not available . Can anybody explain? Thanks in advance:)
Name |
---|
Store an array b where b[i] is the sum of all aj = i
So in the sample, b would be {2, 10, 6}, the problem turns into a simple DP problem, if you are at state i you have 2 options:
1) leave b[i] and move to state i + 1
2) take b[i] and move to state i + R + 1
Giving WA:(
It will be wrong for test case 1 2 1 2 1 3
Sorry missed one more thing, you should set R = min(L, R)
because if you start taking elements in increasing order, then the difference between every consecutive values should be at least R
and if you start taking elements in decreasing order, then the difference between every two consecutive values should be at least L
The optimal solution is to choose the order which gives the minimum difference between consecutive values which is min(L, R)
code
Thanks:) Got it.
hey mate can u explain why it should be min(l,r) and not max(l,r)?? update :-> i got it,still thanks!!
It can be done with this way as well: do DP twice..from index 0 and going to right with distance R and from index 1e5 with distance L, then pick the maximum of the two values obtained.