Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3885 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3580 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3506 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3505 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3457 |
9 | Kevin114514 | 3377 |
10 | gamegame | 3374 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 170 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
5 | Dominater069 | 157 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
8 | awoo | 152 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
Name |
---|
There were atmost 10 operators
Ur complexity isn't $$$O(N!)$$$. Infact if u observe the pattern a bit, you'd find that it's complexity never gets multiplied by factor greater than 4 on increasing N by 1. It's pretty much less than $$$O(4^N)$$$ as well, and it's found out to be roughly O(Catalan Number). For more details, u should check the last part of it's official editorial. Ur solution is the DP solution.