question suggest some approach and reason behind it
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | adamant | 152 |
6 | djm03178 | 152 |
8 | Qingyu | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 149 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Name |
---|
Prove that it is always optimal to swap any element into its final position.
Think of the array as a permutation, and consider cycles in the permutation. Define $$$f(A)$$$ as the sum of one minus the size of each cycle, where fixed points (elements in their final positions) are not counted. The $$$f$$$ value of a sorted array is $$$0$$$. Prove that any swap decreases $$$f$$$ by at most $$$1$$$, and there's always an operation that decreases $$$f$$$ by $$$1$$$.
How can you use knowledge of graph theory to easily determine how many swaps it takes to sort each group of elements?
Stop posting blogs for questions which're already google-able