| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 4039 |
| 2 | tourist | 3841 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
| 5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
| 6 | Benq | 3535 |
| 7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 8 | gamegame | 3477 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3357 |
| 10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 169 |
| 2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 160 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
| 7 | adamant | 153 |
| 8 | luogu_official | 152 |
| 9 | awoo | 151 |
| 10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
There is a graph (might have cycles) in the form of an adjacency list. How can we find the 'size' of the largest connected component?
Example: 0: 1 2 1: 2: 1 3 3: 1 2 4 4: 2 3
Answer: 5 Reason: We start from 0 and go to 1 and 2, from 2 we can reach 3, from 3 we can reach 4.
What can be the most efficient way to calculate this?
