| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Gotta go fast?
Don't laugh at where I have defined the variables.I did that many months ago,code style unlike now.
Changing the divisors' value then we can use sort then,but the code which changes them to -14248 runs faster.It's 15ms faster than the other.Why is this happening?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en4 |
|
HiCode2009 | 2022-10-28 16:26:51 | 45 | ||
| en3 |
|
HiCode2009 | 2022-10-28 16:26:11 | 5 | Tiny change: 'n use sort then,but the c' -> 'n use sort,but the c' | |
| en2 |
|
HiCode2009 | 2022-10-28 16:25:05 | 4 | ||
| en1 |
|
HiCode2009 | 2022-10-28 16:24:52 | 497 | Initial revision (published) |
