| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3985 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3814 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | Benq | 3529 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
| 8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 170 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | adamant | 154 |
| 7 | Dominater069 | 154 |
| 9 | awoo | 153 |
| 10 | luogu_official | 152 |
An interesting problem
Hey, I came across this problem in a course interview I am not sure how to solve it.
We are given a set of $$$n$$$ intervals, let's call it $$$S$$$. Now, we have to output any subset $$$T$$$ of $$$S$$$ such that all the intervals in $$$T$$$ are pairwise disjoint (non-overlapping) and all the intervals in $$$S \smallsetminus T$$$ should intersect with exactly one interval from $$$T$$$.
I am really curious to know what the solution could be.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
serialcomder | 2023-03-21 22:00:34 | 18 | Tiny change: ' disjoint and all t' -> ' disjoint (non-overlapping) and all t' | |
| en1 |
|
serialcomder | 2023-03-21 21:27:14 | 425 | Initial revision (published) |
