| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 156 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
[SOLVED] Problem in understanding Magic Formulas(424C)
Hi,
I just read the editorial of Magic Formulas. I couldn't understand a particular formula in editorial.
In editorial it is written that,
.
But in question, the formula is given as,
.
I am not able to understand how these formulas are equivalent. Please help me understanding what I am missing here.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-29 10:27:15 | 9 | ||
| en1 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-27 12:32:16 | 674 | Initial revision (published) |
