in this problem. the third test case says that node 2 and node 1 have cats so the path from 1 to 2 has 2 cats which is less than m . but the jury answer is that there is no path with <= m cats . can anyone help me understand this test case ?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 151 |
A Graph Problem
in this problem. the third test case says that node 2 and node 1 have cats so the path from 1 to 2 has 2 cats which is less than m . but the jury answer is that there is no path with <= m cats . can anyone help me understand this test case ?
Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en2 | ShowStopper728 | 2017-12-19 11:31:06 | 11 | Tiny change: ' which is less than m .\nbut ' -> ' which is equal to m .\nbut ' | ||
en1 | ShowStopper728 | 2017-12-19 11:28:53 | 305 | Initial revision (published) |
Name |
---|