| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 156 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
When can 'Ofast' optimization bring negative optimization
We all know that this line in C++#pragma GCC optimize("Ofast") can optimize most programs.
But specially, the accident(maybe?) happens on me.
Today, I was solving the problem 455D - Serega and Fun with fhq-treap, And I submitted two submissions: 58122597 and 58123225, when first one got AC with no optimization, and the second with 'Ofast' optimization got TLE on test 25.
So I just want to know what kind of programs the 'Ofast' optimization can bring negative optimization?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en3 |
|
AcceptedIsRealAbility | 2019-08-01 15:10:59 | 1 | Tiny change: 'he problem[problem:4' -> 'he problem [problem:4' | |
| en2 |
|
AcceptedIsRealAbility | 2019-08-01 15:10:30 | 18 | ||
| en1 |
|
AcceptedIsRealAbility | 2019-08-01 15:09:45 | 579 | Initial revision (published) |
