Can anyone give me more detail proof of why the answer to the problem is always summation of min(S[v], 2*k - S[v]).
The editorial is not clear.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Proof of solution of Problem 700B connesting universities?
Can anyone give me more detail proof of why the answer to the problem is always summation of min(S[v], 2*k - S[v]).
The editorial is not clear.
Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en3 | spirited_away_ | 2019-08-30 03:05:56 | 68 | |||
en2 | spirited_away_ | 2019-08-30 03:05:01 | 2 | |||
en1 | spirited_away_ | 2019-08-30 03:04:45 | 249 | Initial revision (published) |
Name |
---|