# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
Usually, topological sort is implemented like
void dfs(int x) {
vis[x] = true;
for(int u = 0; u < n; u++) {
if(!vis[u] && graph[x][u] == 1) {
dfs(u);
}
}
order.push_back(x);
}
And then printed in reverse order But if I implement this way
void dfs(int x) {
order.push_back(x);
vis[x] = true;
for(int u = 0; u < n; u++) {
if(!vis[u] && graph[x][u] == 1) {
dfs(u);
}
}
}
And print in same order.
Can someone provide me a test case where 2nd approach will fail
Name |
---|