I know it is not very appropriate to discuss politics in this CP platform. But this war is too big, and has already influenced this platform. The go study round has already been postponed because of this.
In many social media platforms, there are many jokes about the war, like taking Ukraine women home .... I cannot be more disgusted seeing these comments. War is war, no matter what excuse, it will hurt people badly. It's not game, it's real. I stand against every joke about this war, and hope the war end as soon as possible.
I post this because many people in Ukraine start hating Chinese after seeing these jokes, and ministry of foreign affair suggests Chinese in Ukraine to not expose their nationality in pubic to protect themselves. I would like to say this cannot represent all Chinese. If you see a Chinese on the street, don't assume they support Putin. China already had so many wars and has been invaded by so many countries, Japan, US... we love peace. I stand against every war.
Finally, I send my best wish to Ukrainian, please be safe, and may the war end quickly and back to normal as soon as possible. I also send my best wish to Russians. Standing with Ukrainians does not mean standing against Russians, they are both victims of war.
Fair play. However, in my opinion you still portray yourself as a delusional person, due to the fact that you fail to mention that this is clearly Putin's war, he is the one at fault — and Ukraine is the victim. All other factors that may have had an impact on the development that led to this moment still have to be discussed, but proportionally, they can be ignored.
Edit: I admit, at this point it doesn't even matter who's responsible for the conflict, it just has to stop.
He stated that " If you see a Chinese on the street, don't assume they support Putin." You can clearly see his position in this war.
That's correct, but at the same time he stated that "Standing with Ukrainians does not mean standing against Russians, they are both victims of war." While this is true, it can also interpreted as suggesting that Russia and Ukraine are equally to blame for an invasion with a clear aggressor — or, suggesting that someone else is the cause of this conflict.
Peaceful residents in Russia will suffer due to the sanctions too, I think.A lot of Russians are against the war , they do not deserve it.
Obviously that your education level does not exceed primary school,because you lack basic reading comprehension skills.No wonder you're just a newbie,worse than “pupil”.
It's funny that you felt the need to mention this: This tells more about you than you think, looks like I struck a nerve. At the same time you took the time and decided you don't want to post your answer from your real account — how come?. How do you even know how much time I invested in competitive programming, compared to you, in order to judge whether my rating on a competitive programming site is good or bad? And even if you did know, this shows that you will not shy away from using your standing in a hierarchy to discredit others — congratulations on having this personality trait. You could have simply told me your criticism to my reply and be done with it, like a normal person would do.
Ignore him, he is a communist bot, probably being paid 0.1 USD per post. He has no "real account".
As a Chinese, I stand with all those who love peace, and I am against with all those who bring destruction and death. I wish the war can end soon, and no more innocent people will be harmed.
❤️
As a Chinese, I'm in honor of you and firmly stand with you and all the people who love peace. I know how brave you are in current nationalist situation.
It's so sad that on Chinese social platform so many people advocate the war and leave sarcastic comments on Ukrainain people. That's the crazy washbrain consequece by years of propaganda.
I sincerely hope more Chinese people could stand out to counter the crazy invasion.
BTW also hope taiwan can be eventually handed over to mainland China in peace. Otherwise a hard war across the strait will be definitely unavoidable. That's as terrible as what Ukraine is now.
Please Do NOT mention Taiwan anymore.
Ukraine have nothing to do with Taiwan.
but taiwan was never a part of china, why should taiwan even be handed over to china?
moreover, i don't think china have the guts to declare war on taiwan, for at least, the next 10 years.
Drop this topic, please. That literally does none business of ukraine problem.
But Taiwan is always a part of China. In the one hand,at least after Zheng Chenggong drove away Dutch colonists.Qing Dynasty set up Chinese government in taiwan. In the other hand,people in taiwan and in the main lang of China are both Chinese nation.Nothing(include other unkind countries) can split Taiwan and China.
And,never underestimate the power of china nowadays.China is no longer the “sick man of east Asia” and China has the confidence to beat anyone who wants to split any pieces of china.if you do not agree,put some proper reason or shut up your mouth.
As a Chinese,never angry like this before.
and here we have a perfect example of an indoctrinated chinese person. do some research outside of your country's utopia, kid
thenks for the upvotes gyus
Look, I'm sure that nobody here wants to (or even remotely has the ability to) attack or humiliate China. China is a strong nation that has just won all four top spots at IOI.
As you've mentioned, there are also people living in Taiwan. Please understand that these people also don't want to be attacked or subjugated. When you make your point that "China has the confidence to beat anyone", that understandably gets people very worried.
As far as the legal status is concerned, the PRC has never had control over Taiwan. In fact, the ROC has even been established (1947) before the PRC has been established (1949). So the claim that ROC is part of PRC has the same legal basis as the claim that PRC is now part of ROC, both claims are equally baseless. Today, Taiwan is a self-determined country and the people of Taiwan, in their democratic system, decide on their own future. China and Taiwan have the option to unite, but only if both parties want to, not due to coercion by military force. The UN charta expressly forbids any acts of aggression against any state, no matter whether that state currently is a UN member (and the fact that this law has not always been followed in different contexts does not give anyone a right to break it, just like watching somebody else getting robbed or even getting robbed yourself does not make it any less evil if in a different situation you are going to stab someone).
You made a point about historical origins. The people of Austria are also closely linked to the people of Germany in their history, language and culture. These areas have been part of the same empire I think for roughly 90% of the past millennium. But does that give Germany any right today to exert control over Austria or to establish some kind of greater Germany? If you know anything about history, then you must know that that would be an incredibly terrible idea.
You can disagree with any of that and it might be important to have such an exchange. Only the common understanding must always be that it is never acceptable to use violence for political achievements. Political conflicts must be resolved in a peaceful way, through negotiations or for example through the system of international courts. The rights of every person, in particular the right to live, must always be respected. This very thoughtful post makes exactly that point, urging us all to find a way to get along peacefully in this world:
Also,the UN also accepted the One-China principle which make sure that Taiwan is a part of China
If you're referring to the 1971 decision (Resoultion 2758): It accepts the PRC as UN representative of China, which has been represented by the ROC for the prior years. It does not question Taiwanese statehood in any way, it only is about UN membership. Most importantly, it does not give the PRC any right to attack the ROC, just like the ROC did not have any right to attack the PRC before 1971.
The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China was proclaimed, replacing the government of the Republic of China as the only legal government of the whole of China and the only legal representative in the world. The Republic of China has since ended its historical status. This is the replacement of the old regime by the new regime under the condition that the subject of the same international law has not changed. China's sovereignty and inherent territorial boundaries have not changed because of this. The government of the People's Republic of China fully enjoys and exercises China's sovereignty as a matter of course. sovereignty. //Translated by google
If I proclaim that the world belongs to me, that doesn't make me owner of the world, sorry.
See his last comment carefully, please.
(the one under this)
In addition,every country which established diplomatic relations with China have to pass One-China principle so it's world-recognized.
See e.g. here:
Same for most other nations.
中华人民共和国和澳大利亚政府关于中、澳两国建立外交关系的联合公报
中华人民共和国政府和澳大利亚政府根据两国人民的共同利益和共同愿望，决定自一九七二年十二月二十一日起互相承认并建立外交关系。
两国政府同意，在互相尊重主权和领土完整、互不侵犯、互不干涉内政、平等互利和和平共处的原则的基础上，发展两国之间的外交、友好和合作关系。
澳大利亚政府承认中华人民共和国政府是中国的唯一合法政府，承认中国政府关于台湾是中华人民共和国的一个省的立场，并决定于一九七三年一月二十五日前从台湾撤走其官方代表机构。 中华人民共和国政府对澳大利亚政府的上述立场表示欣赏。
两国政府商定，一俟行政手续和实际安排就绪，双方即互派大使，并在平等互利的基础上，根据国际法和国际惯例，在各自首都为对方的建馆及其执行任务提供一切必要的协助。
This is the original.
After translating(by google): Joint Communiqué of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Australia on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between China and Australia
Based on the common interests and aspirations of the two peoples, the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Australia have decided to recognize each other and establish diplomatic relations from December 21, 1972.
The two governments agreed to develop diplomatic, friendly and cooperative relations between the two countries on the basis of the principles of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, equality, mutual benefit and peaceful coexistence.
The Australian Government recognizes that the Government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government of China, recognizes the Chinese Government's position that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China, and decides to withdraw its official representatives from Taiwan before January 25, 1973 mechanism. The Government of the People's Republic of China appreciates the above position of the Australian Government.
The two governments have agreed that once the administrative formalities and practical arrangements are in place, the two sides will send ambassadors to each other, and on the basis of equality and mutual benefit, in accordance with international law and international practice, in their respective capitals for the establishment of the other party's embassies and the implementation of tasks.
so,any misunderstanding about the word "acknowledged"?
Tiny mistake there, the actual text says 'acknowledges' instead of 'recognizes'.
See original text here from the Australian government. Acknowledging a position does not mean supporting a position. You can acknowledge multiple contradictory positions at the same time.
Sorry, but 'acknowledges' ans 'recognizes' both mean "承认" in Chinese.
So please,may you show me how can someone acknowledges(or recognizes,as you want) but don't support or even position it?(I really don't know that)
I acknowledge the position of the flat earth society that the earth is flat. Meaning I understand that they have this position. At the same time, I don't actually think the earth is flat.
Acknowledging = understanding that someone has a certain position != agreeing with that position.
This play with words makes it easier for the Chinese government to sell the result to the people. I'm sorry in case your government has been misrespresenting what has actually been agreed to.
acknowledge：to accept, admit, or recognize something, or the truth or existence of something
But in Chinese,we think the word as "Acknowledging means affirmation, agreement, approval"(Copied from Baidu Chinese)
I fully understand that.
Acknowledging originates from the word "knowledge". If I acknowledge a position, it means that I know about the position, I agree that the position exists. It does not mean that I support the position itself. In English, this meaning is very clear.
In different contexts (e.g. "acknowledging a fact"), it carries different meaning. I really see that the language is very tricky here. But the Chinese government, without any doubt, was fully aware what this actually means, these words are chosen very carefully.
Well,acknowledging and recognizes both always mean affirmation, agreement, approval in Chinese whatever the context.
I think Australia government had consider it carefully before posting the text.
Again, I understand that. But the document has been signed in English (here) and it is very clear. All parties have been aware of the meaning (or rather absence of meaning).
I assume the Chinese "translation" you're citing has been created by the Chinese government and has not been agreed to by anyone else. If a government creates an incorrect translation and misrepresents the agreement to their population, that does not change the meaning of the actual agreement.
The same language and process has been used with most other nations as well. The "One-China principle" is mainly a linguistic excercise without much actual meaning. This is why governments worldwide have been happy to sign up to it. Outside of China, most people know this and I'm sorry if this has been misrepresented to you.
So,it's meaningless to talk about differences between that word in different languages.Yes?
Because it's irrelevant if Chinese government created the translation for some purpose.It's always the same meaning of the translation whatever the way.
Seems like you can't persuade me and I can't persuade you,too.So just drop the topic(about how do other countries think you it.)Also,if you want to continue to topic,I will continue,too,but it's not good for both you and me.
in addition,i think member states of the UN have the right to make their political personnel to join the organization under the UN.But in 1971 decision (Resoultion 2758)the UN canceled the right of ROC,that means the UN doesn't think ROC is now a country.Also,after checking un.org,there isn't a "The Republic of Taiwan" or any independent country named Taiwan.So,maybe it's enough to express my opinion?
Forgive my poor English. It's translated by "Google Translate".
It is not easy to accurately describe the history of modern China, but I don't think it is a waste of time, on the contrary, it is a communication of Chinese culture.
The Kuomintang was founded in 1894. In the past, it was led by Sun Yat-sen. It was established in the United States. However, due to feudal forces, China was still in chaos in 1926. The warlords were separated. President, started massacres of communists. This history is not a compilation. If you are interested, you can use it to check the "4.12 Counter-Revolutionary Coup". After that, the Chinese Communist Party has been fighting, and it was not until Japan's full-scale invasion of China that they reached a consensus. Note that Japan In 1931, it invaded the three northeastern provinces of China, which was twice the size of Germany. At this time, the Kuomintang did not resist, but asked Japan for weapons and demanded to destroy the Communist Party first.
Japan started a full-scale invasion of China in 1937, and the Anti-Japanese War ended in 1945. You must know that in the end, it was only because of the support of the Soviet Union and the atomic bomb of the United States that Japan was defeated. At that time, China was really at a disadvantage, and the "Southern Anhui Incident" in 1941 died. Thousands of people, the Kuomintang who slaughtered the Communists, beat their own people.
In the final confrontation between the North and the South, the Communist Party won the hearts of the people. In the early stage, 200,000 soldiers fought against 700,000 soldiers. In the later period, it became more than one million against hundreds of thousands. In the end, the remaining members of the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. The Kuomintang is China. Although it was established in the United States, I would like to ask where is the legal effect of the Kuomintang? Isn't a political party called a political party if it is not supported by the Chinese people? So why don't people recognize the choice of the Chinese people? That's because some people are afraid of China's rise. Who is that person? I don't think I need to say more.
关于中国近代的那段历史想要准确的描述并不容易，但是我不认为这是一个浪费时间的事情，相反是中国文化的一种沟通。
国民党成立于1894年，过去是由孙中山领导的，在美国成立，但是由于封建势力，之后1926年中国还在混乱之中，军阀割据，国民党和共产党共同北伐，即将收复全国时孙中山去世，蒋介石成为总统，开始大量屠杀共产党人，这段历史不是编纂，感兴趣的话可以用去查一查 “4.12 反革命政变”，随后中国共产党一直在抗争，直到日本全面侵华前才达成意见统一，注意，日本于1931年入侵中国东北三省，也就是德国的两倍那么大，此时国民党没有反抗，而是向日本请求武器，要求先消灭共产党。
1937年日本开始全面入侵中国，1945年抗战结束，要知道到最后都是因为苏联的支持和美国的原子弹才打垮日本的，当时中国真的很劣势，而1941年的“皖南事变”，死了几千人，就是国民党屠杀了共产党的人，自己人打自己人。
最后的南北对峙时候，共产党获得了民心，前期二十万兵打七十万兵，后期变成了一百多万打几十万，最后国民党剩下的人逃往了台湾，国民党，是中国的政党，虽然是在美国成立的，我想请问国民党的法律效力在哪里？难道政党不是中国的人民支持的才叫政党吗？那为什么大家不承认中国人民的选择呢？那是因为中国崛起有些人怕了，那个人是谁呢？我想我不用多说。
About Austria,you can find out Austria established the state in 1918 but it was annexed by Nazis Germany.You can't disagree that most of the things Nazis had done was evil and not proper for the world and also both Germany and Austria themselves,also,things that Kuomintang had done was similar to the Nazis(even got the help from Nazis) so it's the same reason that why Austria is now a independent country and why Taiwan isn't one.
And the whole sentence I said is "China has the confidence to beat anyone who wants to split any pieces of china".You just lose the most important piece.If you agree with the unity of China,china has no reason to beat anyone.So,to normal Taiwanese,there is nothing to be scared about their safety.And China is doing its best to solve that problem about Taiwan in a peaceful way.But you can find out Cai Yingwen and someone(like Pelosi) is trying to split China,that is the thing we can't stand.So,"China has the confidence to beat anyone who wants to split any pieces of china" is just to them but also normal citizens.
Kuomintang and nazis are not related, please don't make such comparisons, it only diminishes the nazi crimes. They literally led China during the war against Japan and the nazis.
I totally agree with you that the nazi actions were unfathomably evil, I'm glad that we share a common view here. This terrible piece of history is the reason why such actions are banned today. Please let's not repeat any of it! If anyone takes actions similar to those taken by the nazis (e.g. starting a war of aggression and/or violating the fundamental human rights of people), then we should all agree that that act is pure evil and stand against it. Nobody should act the way the nazis have acted.
I don't think your threat of violence really becomes more peaceful by adding that you only threaten violence in case your conditions are not met.
(So may you just not send webs on en.wikipedia to me,please?For an unknown reason,I can't get into the website in China)
All right,back to the main topic.If you have ever read Red Star Over China or any other materials about the war between Chinese Communist Party and Kuomintang,you will find out that some of the Nazis generals offered their help to Kuomintang.
And it's also the basic power for a country to prevent any activities which is going to split the country.
Forgive my poor English. I'm sure that you have a good understanding of PRC. But it can't prove that POC doesn't belong to PRC. POC had legal seat in the United Nations. But in 1971, PRC instead of it. You have mentioned that the legal status, but the founding time can't be the symbol of the country. As far as we all know, Taiwan island was found and communicate with the Old China before 2000 years ago. and the most important is that the legal status has proved the relationship with Taiwan and China. Taiwan is a province of China, i don't want to say too more times. Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration and Japan surrenders had proved it. These are all modern documents.
Do you know why most of the non-Chinese think about that Taiwan province of China is an independent country? You can think about that China is the Top2 country of the world. And we have a huge number of population. If Taiwan belongs to America, it can be easier for US to control the world. If you don't agree on my opinion, please explain me why don't Taiwan's goverment has never bought our weapons instead of America.
Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration and Japan surrenders had proved it. It's China's internal affairs，none of your business......
Taiwan is always a province of China.
Haven't you go to school?Clearly, it`s someone else who needs to go to school.
so Scotland is never a part of UK，and Texas is never a part of USA right?
absolute clown
why am i getting downvoted? am i getting stormed by mad chinese indoctrinated people who think simply taking over a country is good? jesus
There's no ground truth in politics. You'll always get downvotes from the other sides.
If you want to be objective, you say nothing.
Anyway, maybe you need to read the Cairo Declaration.
I suggest stopping straying the discussion to Taiwan in these topics regardless whether you consider it to be a part of mainland China or not.
For the simple reason that Taiwan is not being annihilated right now, but Ukraine is
Tiananmen Square Massacre 1989.
Whenever there are people talking about peace, there are people talking about politics.
I think you are Chinese. Let me say some words to you. 啥比卖国贼，赶紧死吧
What does it means
I'm sorry about my attitude. If you saw someone deliberately insulting your motherland, you would say the same words like me Chinese people generally attach great importance to patriotism. You can search his name on Google. I don't think It's a ordinary person.
I know nothing about Tiananmen Square Massacre.Is it just a fake thing?
Well,I can not use google because of a well-known reason.
It is not fake, the CCP has censored all of your media so you just never hear about it. Thousands of people died, there are many pictures as well but I will refrain from posting due to graphic content.
I usually don't want to swear on such a big community like Codeforces, but hey, I think I have a reason for it, so I'll just go ahead.
The fuck is wrong with you? Why the hell would you turn this peaceful discussion into a political fight? Are you misanthropic or mentally ill for some reason?
The chinese dude unironically said china loves peace. Also he mentions china being invaded yet no mention of illegal occupation of neighboring land by china. The post was political enough already to warrant a political response you dumbfuck.
Okay, Okay, Whatever shit's going on, I know the post was political but it did not mean for fuck's sake to begin a fight over everyone.
Well,I now knows something about that by some other ways.As a cult riots I don't think it's good or something.it's true that ccp did it a little bit radical,but it's not enough to be said as a Massacre or be the evidence to say china hates peace because it do threat Chinese social stability(and they set theirselves on fire instead of CCP's killing).
By the way,isn't china had faced aggression true?And,what aggression did china do?Show your evidence before you show your opinion,OK?
It was not cult riots, it was a peaceful protest by students who wanted democracy. They opened fire on the unarmed crowd and ran tanks over their bodies, that sounds pretty much like a massacre. China has faced aggression I agree, but they also occupied Tibet, invaded Vietnam, invaded India and occupied Aksai Chin among other things. Doesn't sound very peaceful does it?
what kidding.
first,it's true that is cult riots,truth doesn't change because of anyone's saying. Falungong(i don't know what does it be called aboard) is set up to trouble the common life in China,that's what now most Chinese people(almost everyone I know and I can sure it's not the result of any brainwashing) and china do warned them,it's the last action china can take.
According to what I know,nearly no one is killed by others,no more political rumors.
About aggression,Tibet is china's inherent territory and no armed action was take.And china has nothing to do with India.The war between China and Vietnam is a war to protect china itself and you can see China is getting well with Vietnam.
I never heard about Aksai Chin before.
Also it's not a passage talking about these problems.
(It seems that I've reached the maximum comment depth. To check who I'm replying, click the ^ button.)
I'm reluctant to make myself into any political debate, but I can't help saying something when someone have mistaken the facts. And I waited for LiveDreamer to correct them, only to find he/she also made mistakes. So I'm posting this comment.
Every dynasty of China from the 13th century to the 19th century set authorities to administer Tibet. And when the Republic of China drew what seemed to be the first official map of China in 1912, Tibet was one of its province-level administrative areas.
Aksai Chin is one of the disputed territories between China and India. The other one is what China sees as part of South Tibet but India calls "Arunachal Pradesh". For decades the status quo has been Aksai Chin controlled by China and the other disputed land controlled by India. If you are neither Chinese nor Indian, not choosing sides is the best choice.
The war between China and Vietnam started when border conflicts got out of control. One of the border conflicts was Vietnam occupying most of the Nansha Islands which they had previously recognized as part of China.
And LiveDreamer did make something wrong.
He/She mixed up two separate incidents in the late 20th century.
China did have a war with India in 1962, which started as conflicts on disputed lands escalated. This war created the aforementioned status quo.
What are you even saying? Adding a region in my map does not make it mine. After the Qing dynasty ended in 1912, Tibet was ruled by the Dalai Lama for the next 36 years independently, they had nothing to do with China, that is until they invaded it and annexed it.
China invaded Indian territory, let's make that clear.
Repeat,post your evidence before opinions,OK? Well,thanks for jyttoby's help and sorry for my poor history. I think @jyttoby gave his evidence and opinion both clearly,so let's show yours. Liberation of Tibet id liberation of democracy.Tibetans were against Dalai Lama's serfdom system then join in ccp's team.Also the war between Kuomintang and CCP is to decide who will rule China.CCP wins,and Tibet is a part of China(even since Qing),so now Tibet is a part of PRC obviously.
What you say had already enraged all the Chinese on Codeforces.
In fact,I had never been so angry till now,as a Chinese.
Why angry? It is a real incident, you cannot deny it.
You have to understand the reasons ans background before things, then posting opinions about them. Or you comments will make you like a stupid anti-China bot.
From your last post, I learn that you are a hard worker on CP. And from this post, I'm impressed by your empathy and kindness. Wish you good luck! Hope the war ends ASAP.
gg for getting CM
Funny how a Chinese is saying this, coz I am sure the moment anybody mentions Taiwan to be an independent nation, all Chinese people lose their minds lol. You say you stand by the people of Ukraine, but I am pretty sure that if tomorrow, Xi declares war on Taiwan, you guys would definitely support him. And I am also pretty sure that the huge number of Chinese people on CF would together downvote this comment coz hey, I said Taiwan is "independent" ; and that is something y'all cannot tolerate right? Go ahead and downvote this comment and show us all what a bunch of hypocrites you guys are lol
hypocrisy is defined as "the practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case". in this post, the author only expresses their empathy towards the Ukrainian people. it is true, maybe they might consider Taiwan as a part of China or whatever twisted conspiracy you've got going on, but there is no "claiming to have higher standards".
Use words correctly, moron
You've got an avatar of imbecil, do not speak of someone being a moron again, OK?
talk about the irony over here amirite
OK?
is it you?
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/08/23/bXdZi.png
Oh my goodness! I actually learned a new word from school "hypocrite" This is so cool I'm keeping up with the times I have to include one in every sentence.
That's so cool! I'll be an internet trendsetter in no time!
support the unity of china doesn't means be opposed to support Ukraine.There are no similarities between these two problems. I am not going to talk about is taiwan a independent country (even though i don't think it's correct to split china and taiwan) because you can never wake up a person pretending to be asleep,but,throw away your fucking racial prejudice and your superiority of unknown origin.
83 downvotes hmm.. The Chinese are downvoting my comment in droves, just like I said they would. Downvote it all you can guys. Once the war between China and Taiwan starts, I will see whose side you guys will be on. Cheers!!
You get upvote and you say the community supports what you say
You get downvote, which means that the Chinese group voted against your comments
You are right anyway, is that right?
Your logic moves me to tears.
Ok, so if I say Taiwan is an independent nation and get downvoted for that, it means the people who downvoted it consider Taiwan to be a part of China. So that means if tomorrow China declares war on Taiwan, then the CF community wouldn`t have any problem with it coz China is not invading an independent sovereign state right? But everyone here has a problem with Russia invading Ukraine. I see the double standards here , clearly.
Your logic is hilarious.
If I post a blog on codeforces and it says 1+1=2, I get downvoted not because 1+1≠2, but because the person who downvoted me thought I was posting my comments in the wrong place.
Can you please explain how come the community feels that "Support Ukraine" blogs are constructive for CF but "Support Taiwan" comments are destructive for Cf so much so that a single comment receives 85+ downvotes? Please explain, I would like to be enlightened.
All you've done is revive an old blog and try to stir up name-calling.
The author of the blog calls for love and peace, while you mock the Chinese.
(I agree with you, of course)
But you didn't answer my question buddy. Let me ask again. Please explain how come you and the community feel that "Support Ukraine" blogs are constructive for CF but "Support Taiwan" comments are destructive for Cf so much so that a single comment receives 85+ downvotes?
If you think you're right, then you're right.
I'm not going to argue with you any further, the time I put in is not proportional to the reward. You cover your ears forever.
How do I get the idea into your head that "the reply you posted was a piece of crap, meaningless and a troll"? Should I not shout in your ear with a megaphone? Just because you can't read it doesn't mean I didn't say it.
maybe supporting Ukraine is the equivalent of supporting Taiwan, but supporting Ukraine must NOT be the same as provoking the Chinese. < here
And even if you're talking the sky down, that's not why you're reviving an old blog with a reply like this.
"the reply you posted was a piece of crap, meaningless and a troll"....bruh that is what I am asking you to explain to me.. How is my comment considering Taiwan independent, a troll? You are not answering my question but resorting to whataboutism
I have added the "<here" to my replies to make it easy for people like you to spot my points too.
I stopped debating with you not because I ran out of words or you won, but simply because I didn't want to waste too much information on someone who couldn't even extract a point in a sentence.
If you are still unable to read, then I sympathise with you and I can recommend a good hospital for you.
Besides the topic, but I feel this miacul guy gave you a chance to harvest a lot of upvotes lol
Please read some baby's history books. Then come here complain your opinion. Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration and Japan surrenders had proved it. It's China's internal affairs，none of your business......
By that logic, this war is also Russia's internal affairs.. The only reason why Putin declared this war is becoz he doesn't want NATO forces on Russia's borders.. He felt Russia's security is threatened hence to safeguard his country he attacked. A country's security related problems are internal problems to that country right? Why posting support ukraine blogs then huh...FYI when 2 countries start a war, it's no longer their "internal affairs" anymore.. Taiwan is considered to be the semiconductor capital of the world and China declaring war on Taiwan would have devastating effects for the global semiconductor industry.
Emm，Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration and Japan surrenders is the have legal effect. I don't think Russia is the same as China.
Bruv, you truly started a war in the comment section man..damn!!
Is this really a good place to talk about politics？
I think we should stop , You can't let anyone agree with you (Personal view)
Hey guys if we talk about politics more and more...
Codeforces may cannot be visited from Chinese mainland anymore...
because of the reason that you all know....
Yes, The CP platform should not discuss politics. It's not good.
The comment section of this blog should be disabled for the wellbeing of everyone
there's also war in Palestinian why no one knows about it?
This war and occupation lasted more than 50 years.
He's been removed from the map(Google maps) and they're trying to erase his identity.
Typos:
When did US invade China?
What is 'expose their nationality in pubic'?