can you share your idea?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | Qingyu | 155 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
7 | adamant | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
can you share your idea?
Name |
---|
Dijkstra Algorithm for Each Vertex
Run Dijkstra from each vertex. While doing so, keep track of the shortest path to each other vertex.
When considering a new edge during the algorithm, if the edge leads to a vertex already visited, you have found a cycle. Calculate its length and compare it with the shortest cycle found so far.
what is your time complexity?
$$$O(EV\log V)$$$
Is there any way to find with MST(minimum spanning tree)?
Are you looking for something faster than $$$O(EV)$$$? If yes, that isn't possible with MST. Consider a graph where every edge has the same weight. Now the MST is just any spanning tree and it doesn't give you any extra info. This case can be solved in $$$O(EV)$$$ by replacing dijkstra with bfs since all edges have the same weight, but nothing faster is possible afaik.
You can also do this in O(V^3) using Floyd
Is there a less-than-O(V^3) approach, though?