# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 166 |
2 | maomao90 | 163 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | adamant | 160 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | nor | 153 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Name |
---|
Thanks for the mention!
Regarding the comments about the ModInt class: I experimented with it and found it is slightly slower (even with inline class) than the global infix functions, and I find it annoying to convert between ModInt, Int and Long. I also like the fact that by using a global "mp" I am more explicit about which operations are modded or not.
The decision to stick to "mp" was made a long time ago (since I am orange ish). I know many others have used ModInt class and found success, so I would not be surprised if I end up switching to using ModInt later.
Thanks for sharing! According to this comment and other sources in the internet, it's impossible in Kotlin for code like "val == 0" to work when val is ModInt, so ModInt will come with its own caveats...
Didn't have performance problems with it. But, can agree, it's not very handy to cast/work with constants.