As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3803 |
2 | jiangly | 3707 |
3 | Benq | 3627 |
4 | ecnerwala | 3584 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3542 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 167 |
2 | awoo | 163 |
3 | adamant | 162 |
4 | maroonrk | 152 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
5 | nor | 151 |
7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
8 | TheScrasse | 146 |
9 | Petr | 145 |
10 | pajenegod | 143 |
As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
Название |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
As you can see, the stack limit is always 256 MB. The difference is that the 64-bit compiler obviously consumes more memory (in this case, in the stack). Also, as of now, no compiler is judged under Linux.
Why do you say on Linux/Windows? There's nothing in these submissions indicating it, different compiler versions are unrelated to OS.