As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 4039 |
2 | tourist | 3841 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3590 |
5 | ecnerwala | 3542 |
6 | Benq | 3535 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
8 | gamegame | 3477 |
9 | heuristica | 3357 |
10 | Radewoosh | 3355 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
3 | atcoder_official | 160 |
3 | Um_nik | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | Dominater069 | 156 |
7 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 147 |
As you can see, C++20 on Windows got RE. The only reason is C++20's unconfigured infinite recursion stack.
Name |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by yangchang (previous revision, new revision, compare).
As you can see, the stack limit is always 256 MB. The difference is that the 64-bit compiler obviously consumes more memory (in this case, in the stack). Also, as of now, no compiler is judged under Linux.
Why do you say on Linux/Windows? There's nothing in these submissions indicating it, different compiler versions are unrelated to OS.