Qingyu's blog

GPT-o3 can become a red coder?
By Qingyu, 5 weeks ago, In English

I've checked today is not April 1st.

(source: 12 Days of OpenAI: Day 12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKBG1sqdyIU)

  • Vote: I like it
  • +533
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +273 Vote: I do not like it

Merry Christmas!

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +113 Vote: I do not like it

thanks for guiding me to become red

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +102 Vote: I do not like it

Anyone know why o1 is rated 1891 here? From https://openai.com/index/learning-to-reason-with-llms/ o1 preview and o1 are rated 1258 / 1673, respectively.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

    Benq do you think it's the end?

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -27 Vote: I do not like it

      end for us mortal humans, not for gods...

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it -16 Vote: I do not like it

        At this rate, it will be over for these so-called gods soon. It is chess all over again.

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 weeks ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

          what happen to chess will happen to cp too,but ppl still enjoys chess played by humans not some mere machines,

          → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        gods?? there just one

        → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    1891 was o1-ioi I think

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +52 Vote: I do not like it

      hm, o1-ioi is only 1807 in the link I shared though

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        it's probably o1 with high-compute like in the pro plan.

        → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Possibly it's "o1 pro mode" or a finetune like o1-ioi or some other o1 model idk at this point because there's so many

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -9 Vote: I do not like it

in 5 years, there will be no way to pretend that the average human is worth more than a rock

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +80 Vote: I do not like it

I'll wait until it starts participating in live contests and having Red performance

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +23 Vote: I do not like it

damn im cooked

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +25 Vote: I do not like it

Not possible...

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +46 Vote: I do not like it

I doubt that AI can do better math research than humans 5 years later.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +17 Vote: I do not like it

    That's the only thing you're gonna be able to do 5 years later — doubt.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Is this a prediction about humans now vs AIs in 5 years or AI + human in 5 years vs AIs in 5 years?

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Just saying, If they gain to access all the information available to humanity and possibly enough computation power they might be finding new mathematical identities left and right.

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +94 Vote: I do not like it

From the presentation we know, that o3 is significantly more expensive. o1-pro now takes ~3 minutes to answer to 1 query. based on the difference in price for o3, o3 is expected to be like 40-100?(more???) times slower. CF contest lasts at most 3 hours. How can o3 get to 2700 if it will spend all the time on solving problem A? It's very interesting to read the paper about o3, and specifically how do they measure its performance.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

    It must be parallelized. Surely there is something like MCTS involved

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    4 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    do you think it will remain 40-100 ? it will improve by the time and within 3-4 years there will be some another version may be o9-o11 and it's rating will be near Tourist and will be able to solve question within minutes.

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +72 Vote: I do not like it

I will personally volunteer myself as the first human coder to participate in the inevitable human vs AI competitive programming match.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +166 Vote: I do not like it

I only believe it if it was tested in a live contest

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +49 Vote: I do not like it

    Maybe, codeforces should allow some accounts from OpenAI to participate unrated in the competitions? MikeMirzayanov what do you think?

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

    o1-pro was tested in this contest live https://codeforces.net/contest/2040 and solved E,F (the blog has since been deleted)

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it
      The comment removed because of Codeforces rules violation
      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        It also couldn't solve B after multiple attempts, so keep that in mind as well (still, it's really impressive)

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          5 weeks ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          It feels comfortable until your last line

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            5 weeks ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

            I mean, I can't deny it, these new AI models are really impressive for what is, in essence, a "which word is likely to come next" model. With that being said, and I'm paraphrasing from what I've heard others say since I'm nowhere at the level to solve those problems, F was a knowledge problem of Burnside's lemma with a bit of a twist.

            I can't say for certain how these models will evolve; o3 got a super high score on ARC-AGI (a general reasoning task set), which could help its performance on problems like B. On the other hand, we have no idea if these results are embellished or how exactly they're calculating this, so only time will tell.

            → Reply
  • »
    »
    4 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it
    • Humans feel time pressure jitters, algorithms don't, so I think it'll be just fine. And it doesn't matter if it's live contest or not if it had learned the algorithm pattern and the associated description pattern then it's all the same.
    • Although multiple wrong submission can potentially bring the ratings down for these models. :)

    • Also tricky language (which only human intellect can understand) can fool the models. :D

    Merry Christmas! ⛄

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Dude, I feel big threat

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +27 Vote: I do not like it

If o3 really has deep understanding of competitive programming core principles I think it also means it can become a great problemsetting assistant. Of course it won't be able to make AGC-level problems but imagine having more frequent solid div.2 contests that would be great.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +49 Vote: I do not like it

Is this a real life?

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How do these things perform on marathon tasks? Psyho

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -21 Vote: I do not like it

I don't see why people are paranoid about those insane ratings claimed by OpenAI. I guess they're worried about cheaters, but why? Competitive programming isn't only about Codeforces — it's a whole community. In every school and country, we know each other personally, we see each other solve problems live, and we compete against each other in onsite contests. So we know each other's level. When we see someone who we know isn't a strong competitive programmer suddenly ranking in the top 5 of a Codeforces contest, it doesn't mean much. We just feel sorry for them that they've started cheating. It will be more funny when we see a red coder who can't qualify for ICPC nationals from their university.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +49 Vote: I do not like it

    i think you're not seeing the bigger picture, the implications for the competitive programming are huge. 1) we might lose sponsors/sponsored contests because now contest performance isn't a signal for hiring or even skill? 2) let's not kid ourselves, but a lot of people are here just to grind out cp for a job / cv and that's totally fine. now they will be skewing the ratings for literally everyone. 3) from 2 it may follow that codeforces elo system completely breaks and we'll have no rating? the incentive to compete is completely gone which will further drive down the size of the active community there are many more, i bet you could even prompt chatgpt for them :D

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -27 Vote: I do not like it

      we'll have no rating
      And then we will have no cheaters. Happy ending

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +97 Vote: I do not like it

    It will be more funny when we see a red coder who can't qualify for ICPC nationals from their university.

    It's not funny, it happens quite often, for example, at our university(

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Red was just an example, A more accurate example would be a team of newbies qualifying while a team of reds fails to do so. don't tell me it's still not funny

      → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      4 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

      Then their (grandmasters') life choice is wrong lmao

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    I think it has major implications for the whole world, not only competitve programming. For example, pace of mathematical research can easily double almost overnight (realistically over like a year period).

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

According to this article, it does not seem practical for the average user to run?

Quoting, "Granted, the high compute setting was exceedingly expensive — in the order of thousands of dollars per task, according to ARC-AGI co-creator Francois Chollet."

However, this is indeed a large step forward for AI.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    4 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It doesn't matter—SSDs weren't a common choice for the average user 15 years ago. Remember, technology develops exponentially. The cost of chips and electricity isn't the main issue; the key point is that it's possible. btw even cost of running that thing is 1 million per task, if it can solve open problem like P vs NP then people will pay even billion.

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it 
O1: I'm faster than humans

O3: I'm better pal

;(

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +31 Vote: I do not like it

Do I still have a chance to reach LGM before AI?

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +136 Vote: I do not like it

OpenAI is lying. I bought 1 month of o1 and it is not nearly 1900 rating. It is as bad as me. I think they lie on purpose because they are burning a lot of money and they want people to buy their model.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +36 Vote: I do not like it

    True. I have tested o1 and yet it could barely solve most 1500~1600 tasks. I thought that maybe, since it's a language model, it would be better at solving more standard problems. But well, it also failed miserably in some (note: some, not all) quite well known problems. From what I've seen o1 can easily solve "just do X" type problems, and is pretty decent at guessing greedy solutions (when there is one). My guess is that openAI did virtuals with o1 in a bunch of different contests and claimed it to have the rating of the best performance between all these virtuals.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I hope so, but have you seen it solve Div2 E, F in the recent contests?

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I think they mean o1-pro here. Yes it's not quite honest to say "o1" here. o1 is something like 1650 IIRC.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    It is like as devin ai ...

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Day by day I am getting mindfucked with these latest AI updates so much that I might lose my sanity.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +36 Vote: I do not like it

I'm a bit skeptical. o1 is claimed to have a rating around 1800 and I've seen it fail on many div2Bs.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

If I already have lower rating than o1-preview, why should I be concerned?

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

after we have rank Tourist for 4000 ratings, maybe we can have GPT for 4500 or so in the near future.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

WYSI

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +26 Vote: I do not like it

What does the light blue part on o3 mean here? Doesn't seem like the video explained it.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Amazing and unbelievable!

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +162 Vote: I do not like it

I recently subscribed to o1 (not the pro version) in the hope of clearing out some undesirable problems in BOJ mashups, and I got skeptical if this AI is even close to 1600. It can solve some known problems, which probably some Googling will also do. However, in general, the GPT still gets stuck in incorrect solutions very well and has trouble understanding why their solution is incorrect at all.

So, how did the GPT get a gold medal in IOI? Probably because it was able to submit many times. So, if I give them 10,000 counterexamples, it will eventually solve my problem. Maybe I could also get GPT to do 1600-level results if I gave them counterexamples all the time.

In other words, GPT generates solutions decently well, but it is bad at fact-checking. But fact-checking should be the easiest part of this game: You only need to write a stress test. Then why is this not provided on the GPT model? I assume that they are just not able to meet the computational requirements.

I don't think the results are fabricated at all (unlike Google, which I believe fabricates their results) and believe even at o1 model GPT can find a good spot, especially with the recent CF meta emphasizing "ad-hoc" problems which are easy to verify and find a pattern. But this is a void promise if it is impossible to replicate in consumer level. I wonder if o3 is any different.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it -55 Vote: I do not like it

    You can write the code yourself to prompt it to stress-test. I think that shouldn't be part of the default model served to users, it would add too much computation, while 99% of the time during dev use cases users will just feed untestable snippets.

    People have already submitted o1-mini solutions in contest and gotten 2200 performance multiple times.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    I have the o1 pro mode. It can solve problems with difficulty 1600-1700 and can solve some 1800s.

    There are cases that it can't solve 1800 problems but its solution is on the right directions.

    → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +22 Vote: I do not like it

You all are missing a very important thing, o3 takes $100+ per task to compute

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +24 Vote: I do not like it

    Since the scale is logarithmic, o3 high is pretty close to $10000

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -7 Vote: I do not like it

      Yep, they're not replacing us any time soon

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

        your comment gave me beaaaan

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          5 weeks ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          it will only last until 'soon' is over

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            5 weeks ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Have you watched the AlphaGo documentary? It defeated Lee Seedol, who then resigned saying "there is an entity that can't be defeated"-it made Go meaningless for him.

            I kinda feel the same way (tho i am not good, but still). If there is an entity that cannot be defeated no matter how hard i try, then it kinda makes it meaningless. The way i counter it is by thinking-no matter how good the AI is, it can ALWAYS be defeated by humans.

            So, that 'soon' will never come-at least for me. Even if it reaches 5000 rating, i would still believe it can be defeated.

            Sorry for the essay.

            → Reply
            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              5 weeks ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              Well that certainly is an interesting way to look at it. I don't think it should become meaningless if AI becomes better than tourist. I think that, no matter how good AI becomes at math or chess, it will never have the type of awareness that would put it on the same level as people. So like, maybe it will always be worse at pure ad hoc contests.

              → Reply
              • »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                »
                5 weeks ago, # ^ |
                  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

                Yeah, i also think you can always come up with easy ad-hoc problems that AI wont be able to solve. But with the recent developments, I am not sure about that either.

                But either way, i would continue to believe that AI can always be defeated by humans, even in Go and Chess.

                → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 9   Vote: I like it +48 Vote: I do not like it

    This is not for the Codeforces benchmark but for the ARC-AGI benchmark, where they set a new state of the art. Please watch from https://youtu.be/SKBG1sqdyIU?t=304 for more details. Here's the actual benchmark we're looking for:

    According to https://youtu.be/SKBG1sqdyIU?t=670, o3 is actually more cost effective than o1. Here's a comparison based on openai's benchmark (Estimated by my eyes):

    Model Rating Cost per prompt
    o1-mini 1650 $0.22
    o3-mini (low) 1697 $0.1
    o1 1891 $0.82
    o3-mini (medium) 1997 $0.17
    o3-mini (high) 2073 $0.3
    o3 2400 — 2727 $2.15 + Δ
    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +15 Vote: I do not like it

      cp is P2W at this point

      → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      The cost scale is actually logarithmic

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it -10 Vote: I do not like it

        I wonder why you got downvoted. It is logarithmic. It costs like 3000$ per query for o3 with max compute (the one which scores 2727 I believe). They did not publish numbers for cp queries but they did so for ARC and I assume cp ones are not that different.

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          5 weeks ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          they did publish the numbers, read the comment above

          → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

itsover-2

even LGM afraid of this what should I do? raise pigs on the farm?

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

My efforts look like a joke to the AI.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

So why there're two colors above o3 in the chart, I don't understand.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I have exactly same rating as o1-mini wow!

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +13 Vote: I do not like it

I don't think o1 has 1891. I gave him an 1400 problem just now, but he failed to work out it after 20 tries.

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Is it end of an era ? What should new aspiring competitive programmer have to do now ?

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +57 Vote: I do not like it

So what supports their claim of "Elo 2727"? (Apologies if it's included in the video cuz I donot have trivial access to youtube) Last time they claimed o1-mini to be CM level but it could solve only hell classic problems.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I am wondering too. Which account is OpenAI using to participate in the contests?

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Nothing. "Just trust me bro". Although personally, I do trust them given that it's very expensive (around 3000$ per query I believe). They say o3-mini will be released in late January, so we will be able to check at least small model results soon.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      4 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      So 1 prompt costs 3000$????

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 weeks ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

        tbh cost will become irrelevant, it's all about chips and cost of electricity. chips will be cheaper and they will build dedicated nuclear power plants for training. then it will be cheap as o1.

        → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

insane

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -8 Vote: I do not like it

Why do people scare of A.I situation a lot though, since these contest/platform was mostly born for us to study CP, to compete in a peered Contest.

The A.I being good, then it most likely the same situations with a student and his mentor ?

I don't really understand if this is any threat at all. Feel free to inform me, if I'm wrong, I appriciate it a lot !

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 weeks ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +54 Vote: I do not like it

    The A.I being good, then it most likely the same situations with a student and his mentor?

    No. Over half of the people here (and much more in the whole society) are not genuine CP lovers. They will use AI for malicious purposes and we cannot stop them.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 weeks ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      True, in term of the society indeed a good reasoning A.I is a genuine threat.

      I say this because I see some cases where using A.I to learn CP, this could benefit a lot since, there also some people selling course without an actual understanding in CP.

      Thanks for letting me know.

      → Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I'm not sure if I would still be passionate about CP if this is true... But I think I will even though I don't want to accept someone use it to get red (Master is my dream..

→ Reply
»
5 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

I don't think ai will ever reach king title

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Should i start codeforces? Or leave

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -23 Vote: I do not like it

Reddit post with source i think?

Idk, checked the submissions and it seems quite human, but we'll wait and see. Also, please keep in mind that it's only confirmed if it actually performs at 2700 in a real contest, because learned problems are well... part of the training set.

Edit: Nvm, did not watch video.

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

According to the account which the gpt-o3 use, it participate in just 10 contest and cross 4 years.

And currently in codeforces, if you do not submit any code during contest, the contest will unrated to you.

So if there is a another strong person who monitor the gpt, and gpt finish the code first, and if it not perform good, it just not submit the code, it will be easy to get the high rated.

Maybe should wait a more reasonly benchmark, like continously 10 contests that it perform good.

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can gpt o4 do it better?

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

who knows , maybe next version might do problem setting as well up to a certain mark :|

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In chess ai engines outperform humans but that does not mean that people have stoped participating.

Similarly, the world of competitive programming will adjust.

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I think it's a good tool for someone who wants to study on their own, but don't cheat during the contest (sorry for my bad english)

→ Reply
»
4 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +18 Vote: I do not like it

My birthday!

→ Reply
»
3 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How much elo in Deepseek AI? deepseek.com

→ Reply
»
3 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -25 Vote: I do not like it

We tested the free model of ChatGPT on a recent Div4 round, it solved A and C, but failed to solve B even after suggesting it the proper solution (it responded that it is "not needed"). I would suggest taking those numbers with a heavy dose of salt.

→ Reply