Dominater069's blog

Invitation to CodeChef Starters 167(Rated upto 5 stars) — 1st January
By Dominater069, history, 3 days ago, In English

We invite you to participate in CodeChef’s Starters 167, this Wednesday, 1st January, rated upto 5 stars (i.e. for users with rating < 2200).

Time: 8:00 PM — 10:00 PM IST

Joining us on the problem setting panel are:

Written editorials will be available for all on discuss.codechef.com. Pro users can find the editorials directly on the problem pages after the contest. The video editorials of the problems will be available only to Pro users.

Also, if you have some original and engaging problem ideas, and you’re interested in them being used in CodeChef's contests, you can share them here. Hope to see you participating.

Good Luck!

  • Vote: I like it
  • +46
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
3 days ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +33 Vote: I do not like it

dom I am sorry i blamed you for Math puzzles. Its far better last weeks contest that my 10th grade brother could AK using gpt.

→ Reply
»
3 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +33 Vote: I do not like it

please atleast make div2 and div1 gpt proof. Last weeks contest was absolute dog shit.

→ Reply
»
3 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

happy new year and best of luck for contest.

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

I wish every honest participant a good first contest of 2025!

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -16 Vote: I do not like it

Reminder: The contest will start in ~50min.

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Nice

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

How much time does rating update take?

Also I'm doing a contest on codechef after a long time. It doesn't seem to have any of the "cookoff" or other contests. Just "STARTERS". What happened?

When I see the ranking, it's all 1-star profiles. Since it's rated upto 5-stars, atleast some top rankers should be 5-star rated? Does no one do codechef anymore?

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    2 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    There are several divisions on CodeChef now and you likely opened the standings of Div. 4

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    2 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Ratings are usually updated in a day. (I too don't recall the precise timing).

    You will get the exact rating as shown on the Live Ratings section on the right pane of the Contest Page. I have been getting the exact same as shown on this right section at 120 min. (i.e., end of 2-hour contest duration) even though they say plagiarising users get a rating drop later when checks complete which makes me wonder if they get even eliminated from the leaderboard or not for genuine participants to get the right ratings deserved in a contest.

    For all of 1-star rated users in your leaderboard, you had most-likely participated under the their Division 4 which is for users with rating $$$< 1400$$$. Other rated users will participate in different divisions (Div. 1 to 3) as per their rating band. The thresholds for ratings are given at the main contest page. For Example: https://www.codechef.com/START167 will include the Link to the Division-wise pages and explain the bounds of ratings which fit in each division. 5-stars and above will come under Div. 1 here https://www.codechef.com/START167A, while ratings will be impacted only for up to 5-star rated coders.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      2 days ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Thanks, looks like the problems (and constraints) were same for all irrespective of division atleast. Just that higher rated ones didn't have to go through the easy ones.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        2 days ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        You're welcome.

        Just checked, updated ratings have already reflected on our profile rating and graph. So, it takes under ~1.5 hours to update ratings post a Starters contest.

        → Reply
  • »
    »
    2 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    nvm I'm an idiot, ranklist shown is dependent based on your stars. I'm one starred so it showed me the "D" ranking by default. This is the ranking for 5 stars: https://www.codechef.com/rankings/START167A

    → Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Great Questions. Dom is back. Return of the king.

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

great problems !!! btw when is the editorial for icpc amritapuri regional round publish ?

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why was Grid Construction Even placed below Grid Construction Odd in the order? Ig it made difficult to solvers, just because it was below.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    2 days ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

    The order is dynamic and determined by the number of solves.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      2 days ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I mean in the beginning of the contest.

      Its stupid question by me anyways.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        2 days ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Perhaps because it is possible to build a construction for even $$$N$$$ based on the construction for odd $$$N$$$ but not vice-versa. Check the editorial for details.

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          2 days ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          it is because we felt odd was easier than even (that may not correspond to your expectations ofcourse)

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            47 hours ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it -8 Vote: I do not like it

            Can you please give tips how to solve constructive problems ? Is there any way to approach such problems?

            → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      30 hours ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      upd i found the mistake

      → Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

too many problems of same difficulty in $$$div2$$$

→ Reply
»
2 days ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

Disclaimer:

Spoiler
→ Reply
  • »
    »
    44 hours ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

    Is it only me or was the problem wasn't as easy as the number of submissions made it look like?

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      43 hours ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

      It shouldn't have been (I guess it was solved by o1)

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        39 hours ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Is there any way you think we could stop this kind of submissions by gpt, as they are anyways not allowed according to site guidelines?

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          38 hours ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Not easily in terms of administration. Currently the only way to find out if a user is cheating with an LLM is checking their code style, but they can just rewrite easily. The preferrable option right now is to just make tasks that can't be solved by o1 (but this is hard)

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            36 hours ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Also it seems as if they are easily able to do easy tasks of div 2. 3 and 4 making it hard to frame easier wuestion.

            → Reply
  • »
    »
    36 hours ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I don't know about MCMF or used o1, but the solution was fairly simple to think about. Just a few lines of code:

    long long a, ans=0, val=0;
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    cin >> a;
    val += a;
    ans += abs(val);
}
cout << ans << endl;

    But yes I didn't expect it to have more solves than GRIDEVEN.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    36 hours ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    what was your mcmf based proof can you share ? i also think the construction is not at all trivial. nice proof thanks below

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      35 hours ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Consider the graph with $$$n+2$$$ vertices (including source and sink), which is almost a line graph with every edge having $$$1$$$ cost and $$$\infty$$$ capacity. The containers with positive temperature connects to the source, while the ones with negative temperature connects to the sink. The problem is equivalent to MCMF on this graph, except for some extra conditions.

      We will prove that the extra condition does NOT change the optimal cost. For this, consider a condition for an MCMF instance to have optimal costs. An MCMF instance must not yield negative cycles to be optimal. In our problem, we can see that we must NOT flow heat on one wall through both directions to not yield any negative cycles. And conversely, if each wall pushes heat through only one direction, the cost will be optimal.

      And there are constructions that achieve this. Consider a stack-based algorithm; you maintain two stacks $$$pos$$$ and $$$neg$$$ of tuples of $$$(index,flow)$$$. Whenever you find a vertex with nonzero demand/supply you push it to the corresponding stack. When $$$pos$$$ and $$$neg$$$ are both not empty, empty one of them by repeatedly sending flow from top of $$$pos$$$ to top of $$$neg$$$. Convenient invariants of this algorithm assure that at every moment, either every vertex in $$$pos$$$ leads $$$neg$$$, or every vertex in $$$neg$$$ leads $$$pos$$$. This, in turn, yields no wall pushing heat through both directions, meaning no negative cycles.

      → Reply
»
39 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Please see the statistics — https://www.linkedin.com/posts/yash-raj-81974922b_codechef-competitiveprogramming-greedyalgorithm-activity-7280303264292622336-qdO4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android

→ Reply
»
39 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -10 Vote: I do not like it

Why does every problem has to be based on a random observation ..CC Contest dissapoints everytime

→ Reply
»
31 hour(s) ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

I request Codechef to please at least provide a editorials of the contest for free.

If not then provide it for atleast 1 week for free.

I don't Know why they ask money for everyhting.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    29 hours ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    There is a discuss tab on top in CodeChef where the editorial is posted free for each question. You may check that.

    https://discuss.codechef.com/

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      27 hours ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +14 Vote: I do not like it

      oh thankyou very much i take my words back sorry

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        26 hours ago, # ^ |
        ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

        No Problem, there was a time I didn't know where the editorial was published either. Happy Coding

        → Reply
»
31 hour(s) ago, # |
← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hello can anyone share approach for Sum Over Subarrays (SUMFSUB)

I tried using segment trees but the update can go upto N. Then I tried to calculate it subarray length wise but couldn't optimize it from O(n^2) like so:

s = 101101

1 -> 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 6

2 -> 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 6

3-> 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 8

4 -> 3 + 2 + 3 = 8

5 -> 3 + 3 = 6

6 -> 4 = 4

Any hints?

→ Reply
»
5 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

For the problem Grid Construction (Even) how is this output wrong? 

Input:
1
8

My Output:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2 1 4 5 6 7 8 3
5 4 1 6 7 8 3 2
4 7 6 1 8 3 2 5
7 6 3 8 1 2 5 4
6 3 8 5 2 1 4 7
3 8 5 2 7 4 1 6
8 5 2 7 4 3 6 1

S1+S2=(8×8)+(1×8)=72. The sum of any two adjacent rows or columns adds up to 72 as well

Are the solutions incorrectly checked?

→ Reply